Planetary Issues

This morning I found a message in the e-mail inbox from Andrew Fraknoi of Foothill College and editor of the Astronomy Education Review. The note highlights the articles in the latest issue. Among them is "Teaching What a Planet Is: A Roundtable on the Educational Implications of the New Definition of a Planet." The article is an in-depth look at seemingly every issue about the International Astronomical Union's controversial definition of a planet from the points of view of 14 astronomers and educators. Interesting stuff!

I haven't looked through it all yet, but one part that made me pause was that "dwarf" — as in "Pluto is now a dwarf planet" — is a problematic word for more reasons than I first considered. It's bad enough that a dwarf star is still a star, and a dwarf galaxy is still a galaxy, but a dwarf planet isn't a planet. In his introduction to the AER article, David Morrison explains: "Although astronomers have a long tradition of using this word (e.g., dwarf star, dwarf galaxy), this is not a common word in general usage. To many people, apparently, dwarf has a negative connotation, which was not intended by the IAU. (There may also be some problems with translating this word into other languages.)"

Check out the article, and . . . discuss!

All comments must follow the Sky & Telescope Terms of Use and will be moderated prior to posting. Please be civil in your comments. Sky & Telescope reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter’s username, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

COMMENT