Kepler Finds Two “Deep-Fried” Planets

As of now, the scientists associated with NASA's Kepler mission have tallied 2,326 candidate planets around other stars. They were detected by the periodic dips in the light recorded as each planet repeatedly crosses in front of its host star. We science writers have to be careful to mention that only a handful of these candidates have been confirmed by follow-up observations.

But astronomers believe that fewer than 10% (or maybe even 5%) of these candidates will turn out to be "false positives" — stellar systems having mimicked the presence of planets where none actually exist. So I'm not particularly excited by the announcement, earlier this week, that astronomers had confirmed two Earth-size planets identified by the spacecraft. There are already 207 Kepler candidates in this size range, and it's a good bet that most are real.

Moreover, it's not true, as one press release touted, that these widely-trumpeted discoveries, dubbed Kepler-20 e and f, are the "smallest planets found to date." That record is still held by one of the worlds surrounding a pulsar designated B1257+12 — which, I might add, were the first exoplanets to be confirmed, way back in 1992!

Amazing planets of KIC 05807616
Researchers believe the star KIC 05807616 engulfed two nearby planets during its swollen, red-giant phase — and then spit them out once it shrunk to become a hot subdwarf.
S. Charpinet / Univ. of Toulouse
Instead, what got my astro-juices flowing this week was a different Kepler-related article, also published by the journal Nature, announcing the likely detection of two Earth-size planets, dubbed KOI 55.01 and 55.02, tightly bound to a giant, hot B subdwarf star known as KIC 05807616. (KOI means "Kepler Object of Interest".) The study, led by Stéphane Charpinet (University of Toulouse, France), is important because KIC 05807616 used to be an enormously swollen red-giant star.

In order for two planets to be circling just 470,000 and 620,000 miles from their star's surface, as Charpinet's team calculates, they must have had a remarkable past. "Our two planets were most probably swallowed by their parent star when it became a red giant,a stage that ended only ~18 million years ago," the researchers write. "They were probably orbiting further away and may have been dragged deep into the red-giant envelope to their current positions."

Astronomers now know of scads of planets being roasted near their host stars, but these two are the ultimate survivors — and they have much to teach us about the ultimate fate of our own solar system. Some 5 billion years from now, the Sun will swell a couple hundred times its present size, engulfing Mercury, Venus, and Earth. Until now, astronomers had assumed that such ill-fated planets would be incinerated.

But KOI 55.01 and 55.02 are telling a radically different story. Perhaps they were initially gas-rich giant planets, and only their rocky cores have survived after their gassy exteriors evaporated away. Or perhaps, as Eliza Kempton suggests in an accompanying Nature commentary, "The two close-in planets formed anew, after the star receded from its red-giant phase, from material that was left behind when the star expelled its outer layers."

How  the planets of KIC 05807616 survived
It now seems likely that two planets former around KIC 05807616, were later engulfed when the star expanded during its red-giant phase, and survived after the star expelled its outer layers and became a hot subdwarf. The system is some 3,800 light-years from Earth.
Nature
Assuming the two really did become engulfed, it's possible that they also hastened the star's mass loss due to their gravitational pull on its outer layers. Most B subdwarfs are thought to be in tight binary star systems, in which close companions help suck away enough mass during their bloated, red-giant phase to expose their cores. But some B subdwarfs appear to be solitary, and the strange case of KIC 05807616 implies that strong tidal tugs from close-in planets might draw away mass just as well as a stellar companion would.

It's important to note that KOI 55.01 and 55.02 weren't found the way most Kepler candidates are (via transits across the host star's disk), nor are they sure things. KIC 05807616 had already been studied closely because it exhibits a wide range of throbbing pulsations that cause its brightness to vary rhythmically. But Charpinet and his team found two weak brightenings with periods too long to be inherent to the star. After ruling out other possibilities, they concluded that Kepler must be detecting starlight reflecting off a pair of planets circling every 5.8 and 8.2 hours. Working the numbers, the researchers concluded that the planets, presumably rocky, would need have diameters just 76% and 87% that of Earth.

"We only dared hope that we'd see reflected light signatures of tiny planets," exclaims Natalie Batalha, Kepler deputy project scientist. "I'll be watching closely to see how this plays out." For more details, check out the press releases here, here, and here.

This is another example of how Kepler is revolutionizing both stellar science and planetary science. My view is that, in the long term, this mission might be remembered as much for what it has revealed about stars as it has about the worlds around them.

2 thoughts on “Kepler Finds Two “Deep-Fried” Planets

  1. Rod

    If we consider that the two exoplanets formed in situ around the parent star then the HB star was likely
    never a red giant phase thus the stellar
    evolution paradigm has holes. 18
    million years ago as a red giant for the
    host star appeals to evolution that is
    unobservable to explain the origin of this
    system. This is not the first report of HB stars with exoplanets. Observations like these suggest
    uniformitarian assumptions could be on
    the wrong track explaining the origin of
    stars and exoplanets.

  2. Edward Schaefer

    I for one am very amazed by the idea that Kepler can detect planets through their brightness variations as they change phase as seen by us. It makes me wonder how many more planetary signatures are lurking in the Kepler data as longer-term sinusoidal variations.

Comments are closed.