Can an O III nebula filter be called “oh-three”?

I have an ongoing dispute with everybody. I say an O III nebula filter cannot be “oh-three,” since O III stands for doubly ionized oxygen atoms. I call it an “oh-two” filter. Who’s right?

Sorry Philip, you lose. Not only is “oh-three” the universal usage; it makes sense. Well, sort of. A neutral, non-ionized oxygen atom, which has lost zero electrons, is called O I (“oh-one”) because it’s in the first of many possible ionization states. An oxygen atom missing one electron is in the second state, O II, and so on. This is why bright nebulae are called H II (“H-two”) regions, even though a hydrogen atom has only one electron to lose!

— Alan M. MacRobert

All comments must follow the Sky & Telescope Terms of Use and will be moderated prior to posting. Please be civil in your comments. Sky & Telescope reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter’s username, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.