Top 5 Most Recent Articles
Top 5 Most Popular Articles
NEWS BLOG by Kelly Beatty
A Half-Gigabyte View of the Moon
Ever since NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter began circling the Moon at low altitude in mid-2009, planetary scientists and the public have marveled at the incredible trove of observations it's been beaming back to Earth. Most often in the spotlight are the jaw-dropping closeups of Apollo landing sites by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). It can resolve the surface at 2 feet (0.5 m) per pixel — good enough to reveal even the paths worn in the lunar soil by the astronauts' boots.
The work of LROC's wide-angle camera, which provides surface context for those incredible narrow-angle shots, has largely gone unheralded … until now. This past week the team released a new mosaic of the Moon's near side taken entirely with wide-angle frames. Acquired during a two-week period in December, the 1,300 black-and-white frames create a full-disk mosaic measuring 24,000 pixels across. Gulp!
"As the Moon rotated under LRO's orbit," explains LROC team leader Mark Robinson (Arizona State University), "the ground track progressed from east to west (right to left in this mosaic)." The image run was timed to keep the Sun high up in the lunar sky but not straight overhead (its altitude varied from 69° to 82°). This created enough shadowing to define crater rims and other topography crisply, unlike the shadow-free view that we see during a full Moon. The combined image shows slight banding where the 1,024-pixel-wide swaths were stitched together.
Weighing in at just 2 pounds (0.9 kg), LROC's wide-angle camera is small enough to fit in your hand. It features an aperture only 1.2 mm across and a focal length of just 6 mm (for visible-light work). Yet from LRO's very low orbit, currently only 20 miles (30 km) up, this mighty mite can pick out surface details as small as 250 feet (75 m). Click here to view the specifications for LROC's wide- and narrow-angle cameras.
The image looks dark because Robinson and his team have kept the Moon as it really is: dark. On average, the lunar surface reflects only about 12% of the sunlight that strikes it. So a full Moon really isn't dazzlingly bright — it only looks that way to our eyes because of the contrast with the black sky around it.
If your computer's up to it, you can download the full half-gigabyte mosaic here.
"As the Moon rotated under LRO's orbit," explains LROC team leader Mark Robinson (Arizona State University), "the ground track progressed from east to west (right to left in this mosaic)." The image run was timed to keep the Sun high up in the lunar sky but not straight overhead (its altitude varied from 69° to 82°). This created enough shadowing to define crater rims and other topography crisply, unlike the shadow-free view that we see during a full Moon. The combined image shows slight banding where the 1,024-pixel-wide swaths were stitched together.
A close-up of Rupes Recta (usually called the Straight Wall) from the new LROC mosaic of the lunar nearside. Located near the eastern edge of Mare Nubium, this steep-faced scarp is about 70 miles (114 km) long.
NASA / GSFC / Arizona State Univ.
The image looks dark because Robinson and his team have kept the Moon as it really is: dark. On average, the lunar surface reflects only about 12% of the sunlight that strikes it. So a full Moon really isn't dazzlingly bright — it only looks that way to our eyes because of the contrast with the black sky around it.
If your computer's up to it, you can download the full half-gigabyte mosaic here.
Posted by Kelly Beatty, February 25, 2011
The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
First comments (from 18)
awesome
Posted by Anthony Barreiro
February 25, 2011 At 02:23 PM PST
This is a beautiful portrait of the moon. The consistent angle of illumination gives it a very natural, even though physically impossible, appearance. I would love to have a more thoroughly labeled copy of this picture to use as a map.
awesome
Posted by Anthony Barreiro
February 25, 2011 At 02:23 PM PST
This is a beautiful portrait of the moon. The consistent angle of illumination gives it a very natural, even though physically impossible, appearance. I would love to have a more thoroughly labeled copy of this picture to use as a map.
Lovely
Posted by David Illig
February 25, 2011 At 04:16 PM PST
Four minutes with MB Pro/Verizon FIOS :) A great image that I will move to all of my MacBook Pro's for reference purposes.
Full Moon Brightness: Ac Correction
Posted by Ken Musgrave
February 25, 2011 At 07:21 PM PST
Thank you for a great article, Kelly, but I feel obliged to correct this statement:
"So a full Moon really isn't dazzlingly bright — it only looks that way to our eyes because of the contrast with the black sky around it."
This is not true. The moon is a dusty surface, and as such has a very strange BRDF (bidirectional reflection distribution function; this four-dimensional function relates altitude and azimuth of incident light to altitude and azimuth of reflected light) The moon, as a dusty surface, is a strong retroreflector--that is, it reflects light preferentially at 180 degrees to the angle of incidence (backscatter), like a car or bicycle reflector--hence the full moon is significantly brighter per unit area than at other phases.
Sorry to be such a geek, but the knowledge of this factoid got me and my grad student Larry Gritz a moonlighting job modeling the moon for the film Apollo 13 when we were at George Washington University researching computer graphics.
Perhaps more strangely still, dusty surfaces tend to reflect light preferentially *tangent* to the surface, regardless of the angle of incidence of the illuminant. Look at near-moon Apollo photos and you can readily see that this is the case. Surfaces seen tangentially appear unnaturally bright. This explains much about the appearance of the moon at all phases.
Try it in a computer simulation, if you have the fortitude. It works. Got me a job doing special effects at Digital Domain on films like Titanic and Dante's Peak.
-Prof. F. Kenton "Mo" Musgrave
PS: I'm delighted to, after some 30 years as a huge4 fan of S&T, be able to make a contribution!
Uh oh
Posted by Al Wilson
February 26, 2011 At 09:08 AM PST
Uh oh, think I need to upgrade! :-( After 30 minutes of spinning beachball activity, my 2-year-old iMac became unresponsive and I had to pull the plug out of the wall to reset it...
Same Moon IN 3D
Posted by Emily Windsor-Cragg
February 26, 2011 At 11:11 AM PST
Re-rendering your LRO image, further development shows more details and a deeper perspective.
http://www.freecommonlaw.us/images/luna/front/lrocwacnearsideCD.png
As you can see the Moon is not a surface: it is a double-hulled container with transparent "curtains" forming vertical slits (as refrigeration panels in a warehouse).
I have used colors to bring out depth; but of course, these are false hues. And I will not comment on details which have become visible now.
:) EEWC
TIF image one giga-byte
Posted by Emily Windsor-Cragg
February 26, 2011 At 12:05 PM PST
The silly part of this photo is that it is STILL 72 PIXELS PER INCH, and all they did was BLOW IT UP, ENLARGE IT to the size of a family-room-size RUG, 28FT BY 28FT.
But the pixel-by-pixel RESOLUTION is still lousy; there is no greater DETAIL in the larger version; and it pixellates almost immediately if you try to enlarge it.
EEWC
Mirror Image
Posted by Jon Hayden
February 28, 2011 At 02:10 PM PST
Great Image! I have not found a way to open it other than in Windows 7 using Preview from explorer. No other programs will open it. Also it would be greatly appreciated if you could supply a mirror (left to right) of this image that could be used when at the scope. I cannot open in any program that i have that can accomplish this.
Thanks,
A Half-Gigabyte View of the Moon
Posted by Richard Carroll
March 2, 2011 At 03:23 AM PST
After a 10 minute download, my WinXP machine rendered the image well using the free program IrfanView. The Alpine Valley stretched across the screen before pixels began to be visible.
Beutiful Image
Posted by Chris
March 2, 2011 At 10:17 AM PST
I absolutely love the full resolution image. I was able to open this in Adobe Photoshop CS5 with no issue; in fact it opened pretty quickly.
@Emily Windsor-Cragg
Yes, the full resolution, 500GB+ image is only 72 pixels per inch, but it is still 24,000 x 24,000 pixels. This means you could print the image at approximately 28 feet x 28 feet at 300dpi (I'd love a printer that size!). Pixels per inch should only come into play if you are printing a hard copy. For viewing on a screen, a pixel is a pixel is a pixel. If it were a higher resolution (say 300 pixels per inch), it would still be 24,000 x 24,000 pixels, but you would only be able to print the hard copy at just under 7 feet x 7 feet at 300dpi.
I'm pretty sure I have this right, but if not, someone please chime in!
|
|
|
||
|
|
Date:
|



Other links: + digg | + reddit | + del.icio.us | + rss
comments (18)