Top 5 Most Recent Articles
Top 5 Most Popular Articles
NEWS BLOG by Kelly Beatty
Too Much Ado About Daylight-Saving Time
In the wee hours of March 10th, we in the U.S. dutifully reset our clocks forward by an hour, signaling the switch to daylight saving time. Oh, joy! Now I can look forward to having the midsummer Sun set after 8 p.m., and it won't get fully dark for at least another hour after that.
I don't know about you, but our annual switch to daylight time (called "summer time" most everywhere outside the U.S.) does amateur astronomy no favors. Most nights, by the time Sagittarius is up high enough to be seen well, I'm ready to put my head down for sleep.
Things were bad enough — "springing ahead" in April and "falling back" in October — but a few years ago Congress meddled further with Mother Nature when it passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and decreed that daylight-saving time would be extended, beginning in 2007. Now we make the switch from the second Sunday of March until the first Sunday in November, which is about two-thirds of the year. Canada followed our lead, but European countries wait another three weeks to make the switch and Mexico another four.
In fact, although about 75 countries observe some form of summer time, it's mostly a high-latitude phenomenon. Most of the world's population (150+ countries) avoids it altogether, and of course when northern countries are using it, our friends Down Under are not.
So how did all this come about in the first place? During his time as America's envoy to France, Benjamin Franklin once famously (but anonymously) wrote that Parisians could economize on candles by firing cannons at sunrise to get the populace on their feet sooner during summer.
But the tongue-in-cheek Franklin didn't propose changing clocks. For that, I blame golf.
Let's turn back the clock to 1907, when Englishman William Willett published The Waste of Daylight. It seems that Willett, an avid golfer, wanted to spend more time after work working on his putting. So he proposed advancing the clock during summer months. His idea didn't take hold until World War I, when many nations briefly adopted daylight time to conserve energy. After that DST was off-again, on-again here in the U.S., making a comeback during World War II, until Congress made it permanent in 1966.
Remarkably, this time-honored practice has been, and continues to be, controversial. Arizona and Hawaii keep standard time year round; until recently most of Indiana did too. Farmers don't like it. Backyard astronomers don't like it. The date switch in 2007 cost an estimated $500 million to $1 billion. Twice-a-year clock shifts cause confusion, disrupt your sleep, and, according to Swedish researchers, might even increase your risk of a heart attack.
The usual justification for advancing the clock is energy savings. The logic here is that by having more daylight in the evening hours, we use less lighting. But in 1966, when DST became the law of the land, air conditioning wasn't nearly as pervasive as it is now.
At the request of Congress, the Department of Energy analyzed the effects of daylight time's extension in 2007 and concluded that there might be an energy saving of 0.5%. But other findings challenge that assessment. Some studies show that daylight time causes us to use more energy, because we run the AC longer in late afternoon during summer and need more heat on sunless spring and fall mornings.
In October 2008 researchers Matthew Kotchen and Laura Grant (University of California, Santa Barbara) detailed what happened when Indiana caved in and adopted daylight-saving time in 2006. They find that Indianans' energy bills rose about 1% overall after the switch — and 2% to 4% in late summer and early fall. Kotchen told me increased energy use might prove even higher in the South (he's working on it), and he questions the methodology used in the much-touted DOE study.
So the debate goes on. If Congress listened to me instead of those clock-watchers at the Department of Energy, we'd do away with this time-warp nonsense. Let's stop this confusing annual ritual and bring a little more normalcy to our daily lives.
See the excellent article in Wikipedia for more information on Daylight Saving Time.
Daylight-saving time is an annoyance for backyard astronomers.
J. Kelly Beatty
Things were bad enough — "springing ahead" in April and "falling back" in October — but a few years ago Congress meddled further with Mother Nature when it passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and decreed that daylight-saving time would be extended, beginning in 2007. Now we make the switch from the second Sunday of March until the first Sunday in November, which is about two-thirds of the year. Canada followed our lead, but European countries wait another three weeks to make the switch and Mexico another four.
Much of the world used to observe Daylight Saving Time, but then thought better of it.
Wikimedia Commons
So how did all this come about in the first place? During his time as America's envoy to France, Benjamin Franklin once famously (but anonymously) wrote that Parisians could economize on candles by firing cannons at sunrise to get the populace on their feet sooner during summer.
But the tongue-in-cheek Franklin didn't propose changing clocks. For that, I blame golf.
This 1918 poster announces the adoption of Daylight Saving Time during World War I.
Wikimedia Commons
Remarkably, this time-honored practice has been, and continues to be, controversial. Arizona and Hawaii keep standard time year round; until recently most of Indiana did too. Farmers don't like it. Backyard astronomers don't like it. The date switch in 2007 cost an estimated $500 million to $1 billion. Twice-a-year clock shifts cause confusion, disrupt your sleep, and, according to Swedish researchers, might even increase your risk of a heart attack.
The usual justification for advancing the clock is energy savings. The logic here is that by having more daylight in the evening hours, we use less lighting. But in 1966, when DST became the law of the land, air conditioning wasn't nearly as pervasive as it is now.
At the request of Congress, the Department of Energy analyzed the effects of daylight time's extension in 2007 and concluded that there might be an energy saving of 0.5%. But other findings challenge that assessment. Some studies show that daylight time causes us to use more energy, because we run the AC longer in late afternoon during summer and need more heat on sunless spring and fall mornings.
In October 2008 researchers Matthew Kotchen and Laura Grant (University of California, Santa Barbara) detailed what happened when Indiana caved in and adopted daylight-saving time in 2006. They find that Indianans' energy bills rose about 1% overall after the switch — and 2% to 4% in late summer and early fall. Kotchen told me increased energy use might prove even higher in the South (he's working on it), and he questions the methodology used in the much-touted DOE study.
So the debate goes on. If Congress listened to me instead of those clock-watchers at the Department of Energy, we'd do away with this time-warp nonsense. Let's stop this confusing annual ritual and bring a little more normalcy to our daily lives.
See the excellent article in Wikipedia for more information on Daylight Saving Time.
Posted by Kelly Beatty, March 8, 2013
The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
First comments (from 34)
DST
Posted by Leptoquark
March 8, 2013 At 07:46 AM PST
The DST extension in 2007 was Congess's way of looking like it was doing something about energy policy, while not actually doing much. I wish we would narrow it back down to about April-Sept, the way it used to be.
I do have to say, though, that one drawback of DST is that you don't notice the difference between summer and winter day length as much. I spent a couple years living in Japan, which doesn't have DST. I really noticed the bright summer mornings when I would leave the house at the usual time, compared to the dark winter mornings. If Americans, especially kids, could experience a year without DST, I think they would feel more connected to the seasons, in some way.
DST
Posted by Mike
March 8, 2013 At 07:59 AM PST
I always suspected that the energy use argument was bogus due to the probable increased use of A/C when daylight hours are extended. Glad to find out my suspicions are based on fact, though it's unlikely the government will take action on this ridiculous twice yearly ritual.
DST
Posted by Jonathan McDowell
March 8, 2013 At 08:18 AM PST
And while we're at it, let's abolish time zones and all use TCB like FSM intended!
DST
Posted by BibleBeeSenior
March 8, 2013 At 09:21 AM PST
I live in Ohio, but I never change my clocks for DST. I just subtract an hour whenever someone tells me the time for something when everyone else is an hour ahead. DST is such a ridiculous time-warping practice!
DST is a nuisance
Posted by Grant Miller
March 8, 2013 At 09:46 AM PST
I too dislike DST and wish it would go away. One of the very few good uses for it that I recognize is evening outdoor summertime sports activities for the few unfortunate locations that do not have lighted fields.
Supposedly the stress of DST also increases heart attacks slightly. What is the monetary cost to US businesses and citizens having to change all the clocks twice yearly.
The Sun did its job just fine without us messing with it.
DST
Posted by michal
March 8, 2013 At 10:47 AM PST
I live in West Lafayette, IN and I hate it, hate it hate it. We just started observing DST and worse yet, were placed in the eastern time zone. No place except Michigan's UP is farther west in that time zone. The result is that in mid July the sun doesn't cross the meridian until 1:55PM! Did I mention I hate it? Also means I'm getting up in the dark to go to work almost all year. I used to like morning work-outs but now too dangerous to ride a bike in the dark with all the sleepy folk on cell phones. Oh. you really got me started, Kelly!
DST
Posted by Michael Swanson
March 8, 2013 At 11:30 AM PST
Daylight Savings Time is a misnomer. How is it in modern day America, we continue, year after year, to participate in this ridiculous, counter-productive ritual? I have family in Arizona and they don't participate in this nonsense. Let's write our representatives in congress and abolish this, shall we?
Dumb Stupid Time
Posted by Martian Bachelor
March 8, 2013 At 12:46 PM PST
If it's such a great idea, why only one hour of it? Wouldn't 1 1/2 or 2 hours be even better?
But why stop there? 12 or 24 hours should be 12x or 24x times better still. We could even save entire MONTHS and YEARS if we put these principles to their maximum use.
Really, we should start a (spoof) movement just to see how far moronic politicians could be bamboozled.
For April Fool's Day we could make a call to issue a vital immediate national recall of all sundials, because they fail to show the correct, gubmint-approved time. Ha!
Of course if they tried to pass a law making everyone get up and go to bed an hour earlier, the whole nation would be up in arms...
DST
Posted by G P Hanner
March 8, 2013 At 01:14 PM PST
Daylight Saving Time is idiotic at the start. In the northern hemisphere there is more daylight than darkness from the spring equinox to the autumn equinox. The amount of daylight is what it is: You are just getting up an hour earlier and the level of daylight depends on which spring or summer month we are in.
I tend to ignore DST as much as possible. My two dogs, one of which is diabetic, don't know about DST. They need to be fed at a consistent time all the time. In winter we get up at 0700 local and the dogs are fed about 20 minutes later; they are fed again at 1900 local. When DST is imposed on us, we get up at 0800 local and follow our routine. The dogs don't know the difference. I can do that because I don't have a job to go to.
Bond
Posted by Gerry
March 8, 2013 At 05:49 PM PST
As a dark skies campaigner I had a call from a riding school asking my advice about floodlighting to let the children do some work with the horses in winter after school. The owner said that if we put our clocks back the hour to match the rest of Europe she wouldn't need the lights. Amateur astronomers should be careful what they wish for, because the extra hour of evening daylight reduces the imperative to instal outside lighting.
|
|
|
||
|
|
Date:
|



Other links: + digg | + reddit | + del.icio.us | + rss
comments (34)