Top 5 Most Recent Articles
Top 5 Most Popular Articles
Top 5 Most Emailed Articles

OBSERVING BLOG by Alan MacRobert
Comet Holmes Beckons Skygazers Worldwide
| This article will be continuously updated. At the top are the most recent observing reports. Scroll down to see past entries and reader comments. Feel free to add your own observations in the comments section. Also, check out where to spot Comet Holmes with our northern hemisphere finder charts, or make a personalized map with our Interactive Sky Chart. |
In late October amateur astronomers were amazed by the weirdest new object to appear in the sky in memory. And for a couple weeks it was one of the brightest, too. It's still visible with binoculars if you know exactly where to look.
Its startling outburst, however, has a precedent. The comet was also in a major eruption 115 years ago, in November 1892, when English amateur Edwin Holmes was the first to spot it. It reached 4th or 5th magnitude, faded in the following weeks, and then underwent a second eruption 2½ months after the first. (Gary Kronk provides full details in his online history.)
This time Comet Holmes has outdone itself. I've outlined some of the comet's day-by-day evolution below; add your own impressions in the comments section at the end.
And check out (and add to!) the photos submitted by readers worldwide.
---------------------
January 4, 2008: S&T's Tony Flanders writes, "I drove last night to my club’s observing site in Westford, near the edge of the Boston suburbs. It’s not a very dark location, and the sky was brighter than usual due to solid snow cover. Nonetheless, Comet Holmes was quite easy to locate naked-eye, appearing only a little more diffuse than the nearby Double Cluster. Through both my 10x30 and 15x70 binoculars, it was a vague ellipse about 60' by 45', slightly brighter toward the major axis, but otherwise featureless.
"I also picked up Comet Tuttle easily with my 10x30 binoculars, and Tuttle appeared quite bold through my 15x70s. It was a nearly circular blob getting continuously brighter toward the center; I could not see the pseudo-nucleus. I managed to see it intermittently without any optical aid, but only because I knew exactly where to look."
December 11th: The bright, glowing blob that many people saw last night and some mistook for a comet was a fuel dump from a US Atlas Centaur rocket that had just launched a spy satellite. Details.
The real Comet Holmes continues to enlarge, which means its surface brightness is decreasing and it's more easily wiped out by moonlight or light pollution. But if you have a dark sky, the comet's total brightness has remained constant at 3rd magnitude since mid-November! Light curve (scroll down).
December 8th: Tony Flanders comments, "The comet looked just like the photographs under a reasonably dark sky through my 15×70 binoculars and 4.5-inch f/4 scope. It has a sharply delineated leading edge and a fuzzy trailing edge, and was overwhemingly bright."
November 27th: Did I say a few days ago that Comet Holmes had become invisible to the naked eye? That was then; now it’s back. The difference isn’t in the comet. It’s that the Moon has just left the early-evening sky, allowing a dark view for the first time in nearly two weeks.
Around 7 p.m., I stepped out my front door in Boston’s moderately light-polluted outer suburbs, looked up, and there it was again a sizeable puffglow just above Alpha Persei (Mirfak). Not only is the moonlight gone, but now the comet is separated enough from Alpha Per that the star’s 2nd-magnitude glare doesn’t get in the way.
Binoculars actually gave a prettier view than my 12.5-inch reflector framing the big, parabola-shaped comet head (a good 0.7° wide, I estimated) next to the gorgeous starry field of the Alpha Persei Association. Inside the head was the familiar largish glow behind the (invisible) nucleus, and the broad “spine” that’s now extending behind the glow. The 12.5-inch at 75× showed these features hardly any better, so big are they now; the whole thing overfilled the telescope’s view.
Meanwhile, Tony Flanders was observing from a badly light-polluted inner suburb of Boston. He says:
“I got my best naked-eye view of Comet Holmes to date. When the comet first exploded in October, it was extremely bright but nearly stellar. Later on, it got tangled with Alpha Persei and the surrounding group of bright stars. And when the full Moon was nearby, I couldn’t see the comet at all without binoculars.
“But now it’s much easier to spot naked-eye than any deep-sky objects except the Pleiades. It’s big enough so that nobody could mistake it for a star, and it appears significantly brighter than the Andromeda Galaxy or the Double Cluster.
“My most detailed view was through my 70-mm refractor at 20×. The outer coma was pretty vague in the suburban skyglow, but I could trace it to a diameter of roughly 45′. Inside that was a brighter ellipse about 10′ by 25′. The southeast end of the ellipse was quite intense, and it faded out gradually to the northwest.”
November 23rd: Through full moonlight late this evening, Holmes was very large and diffuse through a 10x50 finderscope: just a vague glow in the edge of the Alpha Persei Association. Through the 12.5-inch scope at 75x it was actually harder to see, it was so big. What I was seeing in both cases was the condensation and "spine" that has been showing up in images. No sign of the nucleus.
Enough of moonlight! On Monday the 26th a window of dark sky opens up again between the end of twilight and moonrise (depending on the latitude where you live). This dark window lasts only about a half hour on the 26th (if you're near latitude 40° north) but grows about an hour longer each night after that.
November 22nd: The comet continues to enlarge and fade. It's now moving away from Alpha Persei night by night. The Moon is full on the nights of the 23rd and 24th; this is when the moonlight interference will be worst.
November 18th: No question about it, the comet has lost a lot of its surface brightness in the last few days as it continues to enlarge. In addition it's passing very close to 2nd-magnitude Alpha Persei this week, and the star is bright enough to interfere with the big puffball's visibility. Nor does the increasing moonlight help.
This evening, for the first time, I couldn't see it with the naked eye from my suburban site even with averted vision. Even with binoculars (10x50's) it took a moment to recognize it, as a large, diffuse glow next to Alpha Per and the lovely star-scattering of the Alpha Persei Association.
November 14th: The comet is still as bright as ever, and it has now grown to at least 30 arcminutes as wide as the Sun or the full Moon. The surface brightness is decreasing as the light spreads out over a larger area, but the comet is still visible through binoculars and to the naked eye from typical suburban locations. For the best possible views, try looking after the Moon has set. That's easy to do, as the comet is well above the horizon all night long at mid-northern latitudes.
Comet Holmes is getting rapidly closer to Mirfak (Alpha Persei). At its closest approach, on November 19th, this star should actually appear to be inside the comet's glow.
November 5th: Still the comet remains as bright as ever to the naked eye, though its average surface brightness continues to drop as it enlarges. As of last night it was 14 arcminutes wide, or nearly ¼° half the apparent diameter of the Moon. During this dark-of-the-Moon period (which will end around November 15th), seize whatever chance the weather allows to show family, friends, and strangers something memorable. This is how new amateur astronomers are born.
Deep exposures now show lots of blue gas streamers forming a wide fan of a tail, as in this extraordinary image by Michael Jaeger and Gerald Rhemann. The tail is even being seen visually in large amateur scopes. At last, this thing is starting to look like a comet rather than some kind of lens flare, or a planetary nebula whose evolution was speeded up several million times.
Comet Holmes is enlarging steadily. Gary Seronik shot these images at the same scale at 3-day intervals, on Oct. 26, 29, Nov. 1, and Nov 4. He writes, " I used different exposures in all three to keep up with the comet’s diminishing surface brightness. It’s obvious that we’re dealing with a single eruption event here — it’s almost like watching a planetary nebula evolve in time-lapse."
S&T: Gary Seronik
Wednesday, Oct. 31: If anything, the comet appeared a bit brighter last night: magnitude 2.6 or 2.7 by my naked-eye estimate. As readers have noted, when comparing a hazy comet to pinpoint stars your magnitude estimate will depend on the darkness of your sky. I'm looking through suburban light pollution, which hides some of the light from the outer coma but doesn't affect stars as much. Some people with good dark skies are reporting Holmes at magnitudes 2.1 to 2.4.
Both the round disk of the coma and the bright inner patch offset to the southwest continue to enlarge. But some telesope users are reporting that the nucleus is looking smaller again, perhaps as material clears out from around it.
The coma diameter last night was 10 arcminutes. Its southwest edge continues to be a little vaguer than the northeast edge, and the nucleus remains a little offset from the center toward the northeast.
Wednesday, Oct. 31: No change in brightness last night I still get magnitude 2.8 though magnitude estimates are getting harder now because the comet is much larger and fuzzier than Alpha and Delta Persei. (Though in my case, I can blur them to equal sizes just by taking off my glasses.) In binoculars and telescopes the comet is losing its original sharp-edged disk appearance. It's starting to look more like how a small comet is supposed to look, with a bright inner coma and a dimmer outer coma the traditional clump-of-cotton appearance. The inner coma is still offset to the southwest, getting larger and also more prominent by comparison to the rest. The nucleus near center is getting fuzzier. All still yellow.
Last night Clay Sherrod measured the coma as 545 arcseconds (9.1 arcminutes) wide.
Tuesday, Oct. 30: Still no fading last night. Which makes sense; the dust isn't going to disappear, and even if no more is being produced, what's there now will continue to reflect the same total amount of sunlight even as its surface brightness dims as it spreads. Only when the surface brightness of the coma (or parts of it) becomes comparable to the surface brightness of the sky will the comet become harder to see. And we're about to enter two weeks of moonless dark evenings.
As for now, the naked-eye disk appearance is only making the comet more obvious and easier to spot. It's not like any old star any more! Why not set up your scope in front of the house on Halloween evening for an impromptu star party?
Tony Hoffman of New York City posted to the CometChasing mailing list, "The past two nights I've had the pleasure of observing Comet Holmes witih the naked eye from my Queens neighborhood (one of only 3 comets I've observed with the naked eye from NYC in close to 30 years of living here, the other two being Hale-Bopp and Hyakutake)."
Last night the bright coma was about 8 arcminutes wide, according to a measurement by Clay Sherrod. Its diameter has been growing by 1.3 arcminutes per day. At Paris Observatory, F. Colas and J. Lecacheux that the bright coma has been expanding at a constant rate of 575 meters per second from the nucleus.
Monday, Oct. 29: Last night the comet was very plainly a little disk to the naked eye rather than a star. Definitely a more interesting naked-eye view now! No change in brightness in the last 24 hours. In fact, the average of all good magnitude estimates has basically stayed flat since the outburst. (Light curve.)
Finally, the bright round disk is starting to show some asymmetry. In the 12.5-inch scope at 75x, the disk's northeast edge the side away from the bright fan near the nucleus is looking more compressed and sharp-edged than the southwest edge, which is a bit vaguer. The slightly darker 'moat' inside the disk's edge is better defined on the northeast side too.
The fan southwest of the nucleus seems more diffuse now. The nucleus itself is fuzzier too, no longer so starlike. This was easy to judge tonight because an actual orange star, roughly as bright as the nucleus, was shining right through the disk!
All of the comet's features that are visible in the eyepiece of a telescope are captured in this image by Sean Walker. The bright yellow-white coma is dust lit by sunlight; the green halo is fluorescing gas (the green emission is mainly from C2 and CN molecules). Walker used a 108-mm f/4 Faworski astrograph and a Canon 10D camera. This image is a stack of ten 30-second exposures and (to bring out the nucleus) ten 6-second exposures.
S&T: Sean Walker
Sunday, Oct. 28: By last night the comet had enlarged to 6.3 arcminutes across, as measured by Sherrod on his CCD images. "It's beginning to look a bit nonstellar to the naked eye," writes Alan MacRobert. "Not as crisp and sparkly as Alpha and Delta Persei."
Within a few more days the nonstellar appearance ought to be obvious, making this object more of an attraction for the non-astronomical public. Hold a star party, and alert your local news media!
bulb on a dimmer switch," commented Mike Foreman of Carrollton, Texas, on the Comets Mailing List.
Using Alpha and Delta Per as comparisons (magnitudes 1.9 and 3.0), I estimated the comet to be magnitude 2.8, just a trace fainter (more similar to Delta) than two nights ago. In stabilized 10x50 binoculars it looked just the same as before only bigger, with all its details easier to see.
And is Comet Holmes starting to grow a tail? Several visual observers and imagers report the subtlest traces of one. For instance, at right is a deep image by S&T's Sean Walker on Sunday night.
It's enlarging daily. P. Clay Sherrod took this CCD image at 9:55 UT October 27th, using a 16-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope at f/3 for a 5-second RGB composite exposure.
P. Clay Sherrod
direct measure). On October 25, similar measures of the coma revealed diameter of approximately 121 arcseconds." View the comparison.
Despite moonlight and smoke from wildfires near Los Angeles, Anthony Cook captured the comet at the prime focus of Griffith Observatory's 12-inch Zeiss refractor at 8:30 UT on October 25th. This frame, cropped to 4 arcminutes wide, shows the comet's nucleus slightly off-center in the larger coma. In longer exposures the coma had a well-defined edge, allowing Cook to measure its growth rate. He got a diameter of 86 arcseconds at 7:46 UT, then 89 arcseconds an hour later.
Griffith Observatory / Anthony Cook
"When the clouds finally cleared and I could see it with the naked eye, it was still starlike to my vision. Magnitude 2.7, based on Alpha Persei being mag. 1.9 and Delta Persei mag. 3.0. You just look up and there it is. It's the brightest 'star' in Perseus after Alpha Per and Algol."
Later that night, I checked it out again: "Used the 12.5-inch reflector at 75x, 110x, and 180x. A brilliant, starlike, white nucleus is dead center in the perfectly round coma. What looked like the nucleus in the binoculars is an inner coma or broad fan offset from the nucleus toward the southwest. At these magnifications the bright round disk is no longer perfectly sharp-edged, but still pretty nearly so. It also has a slight but definite ring appearance, as if some of the light is coming from a hollow, spherical, glowing shell. Farther out beyond this is a much dimmer round glow with about twice the diameter of the bright disk. Only out this far does the brilliant skylight of the perigean full Moon in this part of the sky begin to matter. This was at 1 a.m. EDT (5:00 UT) October 26th with the comet (and Moon) near the zenith. Still magnitude 2.7 naked-eye."
This 12-arcminute-wide frame from Arkansas Sky Observatory shows the comet as a brilliant, near-circular disk on the morning of October 25th. Clay Sherrod used a 0.4-meter (16-inch) Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope at f/3.
Clay Sherrod / ASO
Posted Dan Laszlo of Fort Collins, Colorado: "In an 18-inch Newtonian at 90x, the yellow orb is like a bright spherical planetary nebula. Diameter of the bright portion is about equal to the lunar crater Tycho, so magnification helps. I can detect a very faint spherical outer envelope, about equal in radius to the diameter of the bright portion, tough with the moonlight."
From Florian Boyd, Palm Springs, California: "I think this is about the most amazing thing I've ever seen in the sky!"
The Outburst. The first person to notice something happening, according to IAU Circular 8886 (issued October 24th by the Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams) was A. Henriquez Santana at Tenerife, Canary Islands, shortly after midnight on the morning of the 24th local time. The comet was then about 8th magnitude, but within minutes Ramon Naves and colleagues in Barcelona, Spain, caught it at magnitude 7.3.
Internet discussion groups came alive with the news. "To my amazement, 17P had brightened to naked-eye visibility," exclaimed Bob King when he spotted Comet Holmes shortly before dawn in Duluth, Minnesota. "What a sight!" he posted to the Comets Mailing List. Alan Hale of Cloudcroft, New Mexico, concurred. To Hale (well-known codiscoverer of Comet Hale-Bopp) it appeared essentially starlike in a telescope until he switched to high power.
Things only got better. As Earth continued to turn, nightfall arrived in Japan. "It is visible with naked eyes in a large city!" posted Seiichi Yoshida, who observed the comet from beside Tsurumi River in Yokohama. By 17:15 Universal Time he was describing Comet Holmes as magnitude 2.8.
Since then the comet has remained constant at just about that total brightness shining as the third-brightest "star" in Perseus while enlarging substantially. It's still a round disk with a bright, offset core in binoculars and telescopes.
Comet expert Gary Kronk expects Holmes to remain bright and continue enlarging in the coming days, as it makes its way slowly westward across Perseus. Its position on October 30th was 3h 48m, +50.4°; by November 11th it will have moved only a little, to 3h 34m, +50.6° (0hUT). (Ephemeris of its future motion.) On November 1920 the comet will pass closely by Alpha Persei (by 1/3°). For skywatchers in the Northern Hemisphere, Perseus is visible all night around this time of year. The comet will stay in Perseus all the way into next March.
Future prospects. The comet is likely to stay visible to the naked eye until at least mid-November, when evening moonlight returns. The yellow color is dust reflecting sunlight, as confirmed by spectra. Dust is what keeps a comet bright, and it hangs around as opposed to gas (comet gas is green and blue), which blows away more quickly in the solar wind.
The gas tail will probably remain short and wide, due to our perspective on it. The tail is pointing nearly away from us in space we're looking down its length since the comet is nearly on the opposite side of Earth from the Sun. From the comet's viewpoint, the Earth and Sun are only 15° apart, and this "phase angle" will stay small for many months. Which means we'll keep looking down the tail.
Posted by Alan MacRobert, October 27, 2007
The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
First comments (from 176)
Holmes Outburst
Posted by Duncan Parks
October 24, 2007 At 11:06 PM PDT
This one is really rewarding in the telescope, even in urban skyglow. At 72x, it showed a broad, round coma, with a notably bright streak smearing out from a very bright nucleus. Seen from Portland, OR, 10/25, 9:15 pm PDT, 10-inch Dob. We're really lucky to have a clearish night here in October!
Comet Holmes Outburst
Posted by David Knisely
October 24, 2007 At 11:31 PM PDT
Well, I got a better look in my Nexstar 9.25 (0600 UT on Oct. 25th). The comet has a very faint outer halo perhaps four or maybe five arc minutes in diameter. Inside this is a *brilliant* inner coma around 1.5 arc minutes in diameter with very well-defined edges. At 297x, the core showed a small star-like point when the seeing settled with a diffuse conical fan-like brightening flowing away from the nuclear condensation roughly in the anti-solar direction. The edge of the coma seems to show a somewhat shell-like feature, as if the outburst generated a bit of a shock front. The comet is very similar in brightness to Algol (very slightly fainter), so it is probably around magnitude 2.3 to 2.5 or so. I hope it hangs in there for a while!
Comet Holmes (17P)
Posted by Indigo_Sunrise
October 25, 2007 At 09:40 AM PDT
Is it known why the comet has brightened so much? I don't know much about comets, asteroids, etc., but is it because of the mineral or elemental make-up of the comet causing it to brighten as it comes in close proximity to the sun?
I'm hoping it clears up here at my location (MD), so that I can have a chance to view it before it's gone. Which brings me to another question: how long is Comet Holmes expected to be visible?
rain, rain...
Posted by Todd Vance
October 25, 2007 At 10:05 AM PDT
gee--can you guys do something to make sure the comet is still there when the clouds clear and I can actually look? If not, I have to ask The Weather Channel to move the clouds away a little faster :)
All this time, no rain, and now that there's a comet, the Washington, DC area is all clouded over and it rains like in a rainforest or something.
Reasons for Outburst
Posted by Bryan Seigneur
October 25, 2007 At 10:16 AM PDT
IANAAstronomer, or planetologist. However, from reading pop journals, I get the idea that we don't know a lot about the make up or behavior of comets.
One fact is that their orbits move them between extremes. They go from solar altitudes that are near absolute 0 (0K), where methane and many other compounds we think of as gaseous are slowed down and even crystalized, and they swing all the way down to the inner solar system, where things are as we know them, or even hotter.
This can understandably wreak havoc on a poor little planetoid. I assume this havoc of heating, evaporation, an d shifting is seen in the cometary tail. I think it would not be foolish to imagine that any small object like Pluto et al would do similar things if its orbit were magically made wildly eccentric like that of a comets. I'd say the object would then actually be a comet for all intents.
Another fact is that comets change. Think about all the matter that is blown away from a comet, or violently shifted, during its foray into the inner solar system. Then, as it leaves the warm bosom of the sun, things fall back down and freeze solid, but not *at all* necessarily in the same place. If it comes through one time and does one thing, it may do something totally different the next time.
So, we were just lucky enough to spot a comet during a particularly violent warming event.
holmes
Posted by matthew burmeister
October 25, 2007 At 11:42 AM PDT
i hope that i can see this in my 90mm goto!
Comet likely brightning?
Posted by Garret Moore
October 25, 2007 At 01:20 PM PDT
I'm an astronomical and science illustrator and have illustrated many comets based on speculative science. In the 80's I did my first multiple comet illustration after observing many single nuclei and speculating this could happen. Shoemaker-Levy was the first recorded, so I was ecstatic. So, thinking about this for some time now.
I am speculating that the comet could be breaking up and will slowly spread as it is influenced by planetary or solar gravitational. The brightening could be the result of more surface area exposed in the break up. Depending on how it fractioned and warming it could multiply its output my many multiples. Could this be another Shoemaker-Levy? I will go to the software (SNP)to see its track and estimate it's probable effects. I'll be looking to reports here of any observed separation or displacement of the nuclei or dramatic shape changes in the coma.
I will observe tonight, but without a collimator my 17" Dob will be close to useless. Especially in city sky's
Comet 17P Holmes
Posted by Kent Blackwell
October 25, 2007 At 01:48 PM PDT
When I returned home from the movies on Wednesday night, October 24 it was raining. Suddenly the sky temporarily cleared long enough for me to set up my 80mm and 100mm refracting telescope to view the outburst of Comet 17P Holmes from my home in light-polluted Virginia Beach, VA. At 30x in the 80mm the comet closely resembled the reddish colored planetary nebula IC 418 in Lepus. The red color vanished at higher power, nor did it show in the 100mm telescope, although that instrument revealed more inner detail.
As I was connecting A/C power to the motor-driven equatorial mount of the 100mm the rain returned so I had to drag everything quickly back into the garage.
An hour later the skies cleared long enough for me to set up my 10" f/4.7 Dobsonian. Wow! At 175x Comet 17P Holmes resembled the large planetary nebula IC 1535 (Cleopatra's Eye) in Eridanus, only much brighter! The core was exceedingly bright and slightly elongated towards the south.
What a great surprise! What a great comet! Don't miss it.
Kent Blackwell
Virginia Beach, VA
Could this be caused by an Impact.
Posted by Marshall Eubanks
October 25, 2007 At 05:45 PM PDT
I would suspect that the most likely reason for the outburst was that it was hit by a meteor. It will be interesting to see if it was disrupted.
Let's do a back of the envelope sanity check. This looks like considerably more material than came from the "Deep Impact" impactor, which left a 100 meter crater. If Comet Holmes is about the same size as the comets wit known sizes, the exposed surface area is about 100 square km. Assume that the Martian cratering rates apply; there are 200 similar comets, and each is obseved for something between a few months and many years. That is maybe as much as 100,000 years of comet observations and, using the standard Martian crater model at
http://www.psi.edu/projects/mgs/cratering2.html
you can see that the expected crater size in that period for 100 square km is about 30-50 meters (i.e., smaller than the Deep Impact crater). There is thus roughly a 1% chance of forming a 100 meter diameter crater in our observation history, and a pretty small chance of a much larger crater being formed in any comet observed in modern times.
So, I conclude that it is unlikely that this is is due to a meteor impact, unless there is something wrong with my BOE calculations
cOMET hOLMES
Posted by LOUIS wELKE
October 25, 2007 At 06:47 PM PDT
ON 10-25-07 AT 8: 30 PM I began observing Comet Holmes with my Meade 8' LX90 USING a 26 MM 2" eyepiece and tracking the comet just above the star Capella and a little to the south.
I then tried a 2" 16.5mm eyepiece and then went to a 5mm 1.25 eyepiece at 400X it was huge but it had lost resolution so I went back to a 26mm 2" eyepiece that produced 77X.
This is a beautiful comet to watch.
Lou Welke
|
|
|
||
|
|
Date:
|








comments (176)