home > how to > astrophotography

…continued

Of Pixel Size and Focal Reducers
by Dennis di Cicco

CCD image of NGC 2903
Small telescopes can deliver big performance when properly coupled to today’s CCDs with small pixels. This 10-minute exposure of the spiral galaxy NGC 2903 in Leo was made with a Celestron 5-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain and a focal reducer, yielding a effective focal length of 898 mm (about 35 inches). The camera’s 9-micron pixels each covered 2.1' of sky, and the field is nearly 1/2° wide with north up.
Sky & Telescope / Dennis di Cicco

More Thoughts

The previous discussion only highlights ways to maximize the field of view for deep-sky imaging with today’s popular CCDs. There are many other considerations when it comes to matching telescopes and detectors. First, nowhere is it chiseled into stone that you must have an image scale of 2" per pixel. Anyone doing lunar and planetary imaging will get superior results with scales of 1/2" or less per pixel. Even for deep-sky imaging, any site with good seeing will benefit from scales of less than 2". Some image-processing techniques, especially those involving resolution-enhancing algorithms like maximum-entropy deconvolution, work better with images that have large image scales (so-called oversampled images).

Conversely, excellent deep-sky imaging has also been obtained with pixel scales of 4" or more, especially in the case of large, bright objects. Indeed, many stunning images are produced with conventional camera lenses attached to CCDs. The resulting image scales (tens or even hundreds of arcseconds per pixel) may not yield the best-looking stars, but they can render remarkable views of huge nebulae.

Another consideration is that some desirable features are found only on large-pixel chips. Take, for example, the back-illuminated SITe CCDs that are currently available in cameras manufactured by companies such as Apogee Instruments. Having 24-micron-square pixels in arrays with 512 and 1,024 pixels on a side, these chips have exceptional sensitivity, especially to blue light, compared to their front-illuminated cousins. The blue sensitivity alone makes these detectors very attractive to people who are interested in photometry and tricolor imaging.

The number and size of pixels in a detector are only two considerations when you are planning the purchase of a CCD camera. In the coming months we’ll look at other important issues involved with getting the best performance from today’s state-of-the art digital-imaging equipment.

 

Specifications for Popular CCDs
Manufacturer CCD Imaging area
(millimeters)
Array format
(pixels)
Pixel size
(microns)
Total pixels
Kodak KAF-0400 6.9 x 4.6 768 x 512 9 x 9 390,000
Kodak KAF-1000 24.6 x 24.6 1,024 x 1,024 24 x 24 1,000,000
Kodak KAF-1300 20.5 x 16.4 1,280 x 1,024 16 x 16 1,310,000
Kodak KAF-1600 14.0 x 9.3 1,552 x 1,032 9 x 9 1,600,000
Phillips FT-12 7.7 x 7.7 512 x 512 15 x 15 260,000
SITe SI502A 12.3 x 12.3 512 x 512 24 x 24 260,000
SITe SI003A 24.6 x 24.6 1,024 x 1,024 24 x 24 1,000,000
Sony ICX027BLA* 6.4 x 4.3 500 x 256 12.7 x 16.6 13,000
Sony ICX055AL* 4.9 x 3.6 500 x 256 9.8 x 12.6 145,000
Texas Instruments TC-211 2.5 x 2.5 192 x 165 13.75 x 16 32,000
Texas Instruments TC-215 12.3 x 12.3 1,024 x 1,024 12x12 1,000,000
Texas Instruments TC-241* 8.6 x 6.5 375 x 242 23x27 91,000
Texas Instruments TC-245* 6.4 x 4.8 378 x 242 17x19.75 91,000
Texas Instruments TC-255 3.2 x 2.4 320 x 240 10x10 77,000

*An asterisk indicates the size and number of pixels as generally configured for astronomical use, since these chips actually have smaller, highly rectangular pixels originally intended for video applications.



Sky Publishing, a New Track Media Company
Copyright © 2013 New Track Media. All rights reserved.
Sky & Telescope, Night Sky, and SkyandTelescope.com are registered trademarks of New Track Media