NEWS by Camille M. Carlisle

Dark Energy's Early Fingerprints

For the most part, scientists have come to terms with the existence of an unknown antigravity force permeating the cosmos. This "dark energy" — a conveniently ambiguous term for something no one understands — sticks its nose into cosmology on a regular basis and, increasingly, won't be denied.

While we're nowhere near cracking dark energy's secrets, a team of astronomers from the University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy has confirmed its effects on the microwave background radiation we see from the early universe. The team's data also confirm theories that large-scale cosmic structures — shaped in part by dark energy — should give rise to anomalies in this radiation.

The astronomers, led by István Szapudi, looked for what's called the late-time integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect. It's a lot of words to describe something relatively straightforward:

spacetime well
The masses of a galaxy supercluster makes a relatively deep well in space-time, represented here in two dimensions. The more massive an object, the deeper the well — if the mass is not spread out too far.
Casey Reed
Imagine a rubber sheet stretched taut. If you take, say, five dinner plates and set them close to each other on the sheet, they create a deep valley. If instead you spread the plates farther out on the sheet, they'll make a shallower valley.

Now add the astronomy: the plates are the galaxies of a gigantic supercluster 500 million light-years across. The sheet is space-time, and the galaxies in it move apart from each other because space-time is expanding like stretched rubber. (That's what astronomers mean by "expansion of the universe.") Dark energy speeds up the rate of this expansion.

A photon from the far background travels toward you though space-time like a marble rolling on the sheet. It falls down one side of the supercluster's valley, thereby gaining a little energy. In a non-expanding universe, the photon would use up that same amount of energy when it climbed the opposite side, with no net effect.

But in an expanding universe, space-time stretches and the supercluster's valley flattens out during the photon's 500-million-year journey across the valley. When the photo arrives at the other side, the hill it climbs up is shorter than the hill it first went down. So the photon keeps some of the energy that it gained when falling in. This difference appears as a temperature increase — in this case, a change of ninety millionths of one kelvin (i.e. really really small).

On the other hand, if the photon first climbed up a hill — a region with a below-average number of galaxies such as a supervoid — that hill would be lower by the time the photon came back down. The photon would never regain all the energy it lost by climbing. In this case, the photon would be slightly colder.

That's the late-time integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect.

WMAP map of CMB
In this all-sky map, NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) records minuscule temperature fluctuations in the CMB as different colors. These fluctuations are the noise that Szapudi's team had to overcome.
NASA / WMAP Science Team
The Hawaii team studied this effect on microwaves that passed through 50 superclusters and 50 supervoids mapped at various places on the sky by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The microwaves come from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation — the blotched-looking image at right that is our earliest picture of the universe, originating when matter and light separated a mere 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

Because temperature fluctuations existed in the CMB even before the radiation passed through later superstructures, the astronomers had to find a way to reveal the ISW effect hiding in this "noise." They did so by stacking CMB images of the sky that correspond to superstructures' locations.

"Each time you add another image to the stack, the CMB fluctuations average out, thus get smaller, and our desired ISW signal gets stronger," explains Szapudi. Summing up the stacks, the scientists found that slightly warm and cool spots on the microwave background indeed line up with superclusters and supervoids, respectively. The spots' sizes and strengths across cosmic ages match what accelerating expansion predicts.

superstructure locations
The positions of known supervoids and superclusters is overlaid on the WMAP data. The blue circles mark supervoids, the red ones superclusters.
U of Hawaii: B. Granett, M. Neyrinck, I. Szapudi
Scientists have studied the ISW effect before, and the Hawaii group's results bring us no closer to understanding dark energy's nature, says Mario Livio (Space Telescope Science Institute). Still, the study supports other teams' work, particularly theories that the prominent "Cold Spot" — a (you guessed it) very cold region on the CMB discovered in 2004 — results from a supervoid (still unconfirmed, but more likely now). And the further evidence for dark energy's existence may be a solid step toward constraining current cosmological models, notes Sean Carroll (Caltech).

The paper, lead-authored by Benjamin Granett in collaboration with Szapudi and Mark Neyrinck, will appear in a future issue of the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

More information is in an Institute for Astronomy press release, along with some great images and animations.

Posted by Camille M. Carlisle , August 6, 2008
related content: News Topics, Cosmology news
links: + digg | + del.icio.us | + reddit | + permalink | + rss

comments (22)

Post a Comment


The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.

First comments (from 22)

I agree

Posted by Chris August 8, 2008 At 09:59 AM PDT
"a conveniently ambiguous term for something no one understands" It is so refreshing to hear someone in the science media say that out loud.


Bubble-wrap universe

Posted by George Olshevsky August 8, 2008 At 12:53 PM PDT
I think the recent advances in cosmology have laid to rest a fundamental assumption about the shape of the universe, namely, the assumption that spacetime, before the formation of matter, had a uniform overall curvature on large scales (which matter messes up by its presence). We know that the presence of matter curves spacetime and changes geodesics from simple Euclidean straight lines to curves of various kinds, such as the helices described by orbiting planets. But suppose that, before there was matter, the universe came “pre-curved,” with regions of positive and negative curvature spread throughout, something like the bubbles in a sheet of bubble-wrap, only four-dimensional. Overall, viewed from an external perspective, the universe seems homogeneous, but up close, spacetime becomes a lattice of “hills” and “valleys,” the hills being regions of negatively curved spacetime and the valleys being regions of positively curved spacetime. Much like the earth, seen from far away, looks like a perfect sphere but nevertheless has its familiar hills and valleys and seas and continents once you zoom in for a closer look. continued in next comment--


Bubblw-wrap universe continued

Posted by George Olshevsky August 8, 2008 At 12:54 PM PDT
A region of positively curved spacetime would tend to accumulate matter, since geodesics (the path matter takes in free fall) tend to converge when their space is positively curved. As matter accumulates, the ambient positive curvature increases/ Contrariwise, a region of negatively curved spacetime would tend to disperse matter, since geodesics in negatively curved spaces tend to diverge. As matter flees the negatively curved voids, the ambient curvature tends ot decrease further (become more negative). These properties are strongly reminiscent of what we now see as galactic voids and clusters. If, at the Big Bang, the universe was a seething mess of relatively enormous spacetime-curvature quantum fluctuations (the Heisenberg uncertainty principle applies to spacetime curvature, which is equivalent to potential energy), these would have been frozen in place and greatly flattened out by Cosmic Inflation, resulting in very gently curved, enormous bubbles of positively curved spacetime within a filigree of gently negatively curved spacetime—without the need for any kinds of dark matter particles or dark energy. “Dark matter”simply mimics the properties of positively curved spacetime, “dark energy” mimics the properties of negatively curved spacetime. By present reckoning, about 73% of the volume of the visible universe is negatively curved, 27% positively curved, corresponding to the calculated magnitudes of “dark matter” and “dark energy.” And the regions of negative curvature appear to be expanding. continued in next comment


Bubble-wrap universe (final)

Posted by George Olshevsky August 8, 2008 At 12:55 PM PDT
We know that time runs slower, relative to an external observer, in regions of positively curved spacetime, to the point where it runs infinitely slowly (stops) at the event horizon of a black hole. Contrariwise, time should run faster, relative to an external observer, in regions of negatively curved spacetime. There seem to be no regions of extremely high negative curvature in the visible universe, so the speedup effect should be barely detectable in intergalactic voids if it exists. Or, the apparent acceleration of the universal expansion attributed to “dark energy” might in some way simply be an artifact of this time speedup.


Re Bubble-wrap Universe

Posted by Allan Holmgren August 8, 2008 At 09:18 PM PDT
What an intriguing theory. I think you may be on to something here. One way we could look for this time speedup would be to catalogue a number of type II supernova's for a given class of stars in these regions of accellerated expansion and see if the fade-down times are shorter. If the overall majority of them are, this would indicate that this time speedup is the case.


Re: Bubble-wrap Universe

Posted by George Olshevsky August 10, 2008 At 01:25 PM PDT
The supernova test seems sound, but there may be trouble finding enough matter in a void to make a supernova(!). Perhaps an obliging galaxy, aimed properly, might stray into such a region every so often.


Re: Bubble-wrap Universe

Posted by George Olshevsky August 10, 2008 At 01:27 PM PDT
Some further interesting properties of negatively-curved (hyperbolic) regions of spacetime include the opposite of “gravitational redshift,” namely, “antigravitational blueshift.” Photons emerging from a source inside a region of negative spacetime curvature should have their frequencies increased. This is equivalent to the “time speedup” effect described previously... continued in next comment...


Re: Bubble-wrap Universe

Posted by George Olshevsky August 10, 2008 At 01:29 PM PDT
Left to itself, without interference from matter, positively curved spacetime is unstable and will in time contract to a singularity. Contrariwise, negatively curved spacetime will in time expand forever, “trying” to become Euclidean by making its curvature “less negative.”. In our universe, the latter effect helps to keep the former effect from dominating and collapsing the universe into a black hole. This also perhaps accounts for why there are no apparent regions of highly curved hyperbolic spacetime: they rapidly expanded—and are probably doing so even now—and "flattened out." ...concluded in next comment...


Re: Bubble-wrap Universe

Posted by George Olshevsky August 10, 2008 At 01:29 PM PDT
Left to itself, without interference from matter, positively curved spacetime is unstable and will in time contract to a singularity. Contrariwise, negatively curved spacetime will in time expand forever, “trying” to become Euclidean by making its curvature “less negative.”. In our universe, the latter effect helps to keep the former effect from dominating and collapsing the universe into a black hole. This also perhaps accounts for why there are no apparent regions of highly curved hyperbolic spacetime: they rapidly expanded—and are probably doing so even now—and "flattened out." ...concluded in next comment...


Re: Bubble-wrap Universe

Posted by George Olshevsky August 10, 2008 At 01:30 PM PDT
If you construct a sphere in Euclidean (“flat”) space, its volume will always be pi times the radius squared. In positively curved space, the volume of a like sphere will always exceed pi times the radius squared, and in negatively curved space, the volume will always fall short of pi times the radius squared. I can see no theoretical reason that the volume inside the former cannot be made as large as we like, nor do I see any theoretical reason that the volume inside the latter cannot be made as small as zero, for any given radius greater than zero.


Search:
 
Tag:
 
Author:
 
Date:  
 









Sky Publishing, a New Track Media Company
Copyright © 2008 New Track Media. All rights reserved.
Sky & Telescope, Night Sky, and SkyandTelescope.com are registered trademarks of New Track Media