Dissecting a Microquasar
For 25 years astronomers have been scratching their heads over the energetic binary star SS 433, a so-called microquasar in Aquila. And even though lots of new data were unveiled yesterday at the American Astronomical Society meeting now underway in Atlanta, Georgia, the experts are scratching their heads still.
That much has been known for years. But what type of star is fueling the disk and jets? And is the compact object a neutron star or a black hole?
In truth, no one knows. Two independent groups, using entirely different methods, have both concluded that the compact object is a black hole, but their mass estimates differ substantially, leaving a little wiggle room for the possibility that the object is a neutron star. The two groups also disagree about the donor star's mass.
One team, led by Georgia State University astronomers Todd Hillwig and Douglas Gies, imaged SS 433 in visible light with the 4.0-meter Mayall Telescope on Arizona's Kitt Peak. To avoid the accretion disk’s intense glare, the team observed the system at a critical juncture when the star moves in front of the disk and eclipses its bright center. "This alignment only occurs twice per year," says Gies, because the system's orbital plane isn't parallel to our line of sight.
However, another team, led by MIT astronomers Herman Marshall and Laura Lopez, announced a much higher mass estimate for the compact object one that would place it firmly in the black-hole camp.
Marshall and Lopez's team took X-ray spectra of SS 433 over the course of a year with the Chandra X-ray Observatory. These spectra yielded a treasure trove of information about the jets, including its diameter (just 2,000 kilometers); a size and mass for the "normal" donor star (9.6 solar diameters and 27 solar masses, respectively); and a compact-object mass of 8 Suns.
"If you had to bet" on whether the compact object is a black hole or neutron star "before today, most astronomers would have refused the bet. But the odds are now tipping in the balance of a black hole," said independent commentator Bruce Margon (Space Telescope Science Institute), one of the astronomers who first called attention to SS 433’s unusual nature in the late 1970s. However, he cautions, "there is no smoking gun."





