Top 5 Most Recent Articles
Top 5 Most Popular Articles
Top 5 Most Emailed Articles
NEWS by Kelly Beatty
Daylight-Saving Time? Bah, Humbug!
Recently a local community organizer asked me to help her find some dates and times for family-friendly star parties over the summer. One problem, I said, is that here in Massachusetts the midsummer Sun doesn't set until after 8 p.m. and it doesn't get fully dark for at least another hour. It's challenging for young children to stay awake so late into the evening. "You can blame daylight-saving time," I told her.
I don't know about you, but our annual switch to daylight time (called "summer time" most everywhere outside the U.S.) does amateur astronomy no favors. Most nights, by the time Sagittarius is up high enough to be seen well, I'm ready to put my head down for sleep.
Things were bad enough — "springing ahead" in April and "falling back" in October — but a few years ago Congress meddled further with Mother Nature when it passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and decreed that daylight-saving time would be extended, beginning in 2007. Now we make the switch from the second Sunday of March until the first Sunday in November, which is about two-thirds of the year. Canada followed our lead, but European countries wait another three weeks to make the switch and Mexico another four.
In fact, although 76 countries observe some form of summer time, it's mostly a high-latitude phenomenon. Most of the world's population avoids it altogether, and of course when northern countries are using it, our friends Down Under are not.
So how did all this come about in the first place? During his time as America's envoy to France, Benjamin Franklin once famously (but anonymously) wrote that Parisians could economize on candles by firing cannons at sunrise to get the populace on their feet sooner during summer.
But the tongue-in-cheek Franklin didn't propose changing clocks. For that, I blame golf.
Let's turn back the clock to 1907, when Englishman William Willett published The Waste of Daylight. It seems that Willett, an avid golfer, wanted to spend more time after work working on his putting. So he proposed advancing the clock during summer months. His idea didn't take hold until World War I, when many nations briefly adopted daylight time to conserve energy. After that DST was off-again, on-again here in the U.S., making a comeback during World War II, until Congress made it permanent in 1966.
Remarkably, this time-honored practice has been, and continues to be, controversial. Arizona and Hawaii keep standard time year round; until recently most of Indiana did too. Farmers don't like it. Backyard astronomers don't like it. The date switch in 2007 cost an estimated $500 million to $1 billion. Twice-a-year clock shifts cause confusion, disrupt your sleep, and, according to Swedish researchers, might even increase your risk of a heart attack.
The usual justification for advancing the clock is energy savings. The logic here is that by having more daylight in the evening hours, we use less lighting. But in 1966, when DST became the law of the land, air conditioning wasn't nearly as pervasive as it is now.
At the request of Congress, the Department of Energy analyzed the effects of daylight time's extension in 2007 and concluded that there might be an energy saving of 0.5%. But other findings challenge that assessment. Some studies show that daylight time causes us to use more energy, because we run the AC longer in late afternoon during summer and need more heat on sunless spring and fall mornings.
Last October researchers Matthew Kotchen and Laura Grant (University of California, Santa Barbara) detailed what happened when Indiana caved in and adopted daylight-saving time in 2006. They find that Indianans' energy bills rose about 1% overall after the switch — and 2% to 4% in late summer and early fall. Kotchen told me increased energy use might prove even higher in the South (he's working on it), and he questions the methodology used in the much-touted DOE study.
So the debate goes on. If Congress listened to me instead of those clock-watchers at the Department of Energy, we'd do away with this time-warp nonsense. And if a White House star party really happens this year and I get a moment with President Obama, I'll urge him to stop this confusing annual ritual and bring a little more normalcy to our daily lives.
See the excellent article in Wikipedia for more information on Daylight Saving Time.
Daylight-saving time is an annoyance for backyard astronomers.
J. Kelly Beatty
Things were bad enough — "springing ahead" in April and "falling back" in October — but a few years ago Congress meddled further with Mother Nature when it passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and decreed that daylight-saving time would be extended, beginning in 2007. Now we make the switch from the second Sunday of March until the first Sunday in November, which is about two-thirds of the year. Canada followed our lead, but European countries wait another three weeks to make the switch and Mexico another four.
Much of the world used to observe Daylight Saving Time, but then thought better of it.
Wikimedia Commons
So how did all this come about in the first place? During his time as America's envoy to France, Benjamin Franklin once famously (but anonymously) wrote that Parisians could economize on candles by firing cannons at sunrise to get the populace on their feet sooner during summer.
But the tongue-in-cheek Franklin didn't propose changing clocks. For that, I blame golf.
This 1918 poster announces the adoption of Daylight Saving Time during World War I.
Wikimedia Commons
Remarkably, this time-honored practice has been, and continues to be, controversial. Arizona and Hawaii keep standard time year round; until recently most of Indiana did too. Farmers don't like it. Backyard astronomers don't like it. The date switch in 2007 cost an estimated $500 million to $1 billion. Twice-a-year clock shifts cause confusion, disrupt your sleep, and, according to Swedish researchers, might even increase your risk of a heart attack.
The usual justification for advancing the clock is energy savings. The logic here is that by having more daylight in the evening hours, we use less lighting. But in 1966, when DST became the law of the land, air conditioning wasn't nearly as pervasive as it is now.
At the request of Congress, the Department of Energy analyzed the effects of daylight time's extension in 2007 and concluded that there might be an energy saving of 0.5%. But other findings challenge that assessment. Some studies show that daylight time causes us to use more energy, because we run the AC longer in late afternoon during summer and need more heat on sunless spring and fall mornings.
Last October researchers Matthew Kotchen and Laura Grant (University of California, Santa Barbara) detailed what happened when Indiana caved in and adopted daylight-saving time in 2006. They find that Indianans' energy bills rose about 1% overall after the switch — and 2% to 4% in late summer and early fall. Kotchen told me increased energy use might prove even higher in the South (he's working on it), and he questions the methodology used in the much-touted DOE study.
So the debate goes on. If Congress listened to me instead of those clock-watchers at the Department of Energy, we'd do away with this time-warp nonsense. And if a White House star party really happens this year and I get a moment with President Obama, I'll urge him to stop this confusing annual ritual and bring a little more normalcy to our daily lives.
See the excellent article in Wikipedia for more information on Daylight Saving Time.
Posted by Kelly Beatty, March 18, 2009
The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
First comments (from 25)
Daylight-Saving Time? Bah, Humbug!
Posted by Eric F. Diaz
March 19, 2009 At 05:28 PM PDT
I'm with you, Kelly! This daylight-savings time is nothing but a useless royal pain! Until I read this blog, I thought I was the only one that felt that way. I can't tell you how gratifying it is to hear that you as well as many others feel the same way.
I sincerely hope that you can get the ear of the President if the White House star party does indeed take place.
Clear skies,
Eric
Amen!
Posted by Grant Miller
March 19, 2009 At 06:30 PM PDT
I hate DST, too. Just think of all the time and money that is wasted just changing all the clocks twice every year. Not to mention that it confuses my children into thinking that their bedtime has shifted, "but it's still light outside Daddy". Law enforcement, the military, hospitals, and others also have to deal with the confusion of keeping and recording "accurate" time records when the clocks suddenly shift an hour.
I wish you the best of luck with the President, but I fear we have a long way to go in convincing the majority of the rest of the public that DST should be discontinued.
DST
Posted by Joseph
March 19, 2009 At 09:52 PM PDT
I believe I probably have one the best schedules. I am a chef, so we are talking afternoons and evenings. I can not think of a better way to relax.
Negative Effects of Daylight Savings Time
Posted by Daniel Kunimura
March 20, 2009 At 06:35 AM PDT
Studies have also shown that another repercussion of increasing the length of daylight savings time (in America, anyway) is that with the increase of daylight hours people will tend to spend more time on the road in their vehicles which increase fuel consumption and carbon based emissions.
Daylight Saving Time
Posted by Gerald Hanner
March 20, 2009 At 08:04 AM PDT
Your map of the USA omits the fact that both Hawai'i and Alaska don't participate in DST. The reasons should be obvious. For the rest of the continental 48, DST is an act of supreme stupidity and exacerbated by the clown show that is the US Congress.
Enacting DST as an energy saver is the ultimate act of futility; enacting DST so that it covers the period between the autumnal equinox and the spring equinox ignores the fact that there are more hours of darkness than daylight during those months. There is no daylight to "save." In the late 20th/early 21st centuries, we routinely turn night into day. We operate 24/7. There is a growing concern that light pollution is taking away our ability to conduct astronomy. Many workers nowadays have the option of "flex time;" they can control their working/leisure hours to suit themselves.
Face facts: Moving the clocks forward an hour in late winter only gets working people up an hour earlier. They still go to work in the dark, or at best, in the early morning twilight. DST is an anachronism and meaningless in modern US culture.
DST
Posted by Fred H
March 20, 2009 At 09:12 AM PDT
I understand that there is a possible push to make DST permanent and extend it another hour to 2 hours total. Keep in mind, this is only a rumor. Anyone know the truth here?
DST bad in Boston? Try Indiana!
Posted by Bruce
March 20, 2009 At 09:45 AM PDT
One of the big reasons Indiana balked for so many years is because we're on the western edge of the eastern time zone. For all practical purposes, we've been observing daylight savings time year-'round. Since conversion in 2007 I've driven to work in the dark more times than I care to count. And astronomy? In late June and early July it doesn't get dark until 11 PM. I'm not kidding.
I feel for your astronomy situation in Boston but it's NOTHING compared to the fiasco that occurred here. I blame our governor (Mitch Daniels) for it.
DST Humbug
Posted by John Collins
March 20, 2009 At 09:47 AM PDT
When I was a child, I learned from my learned relatives that DST had nothing to do with saving energy or using more fuel, etc.
It had to do with farming. Farmers had (have) lots of work to do in the summer time. When it is light at 5 AM ST, farmers are in still bed sleeping and losing good daylight time. By changing that 5AM to 6AM (DST), farm prople are getting just up allowing that extra daylight time for farm work.
Regards to all,
John
DST
Posted by Ptoe
March 20, 2009 At 10:07 AM PDT
I despise it! Always have. Truly messes with my circadian rhythm! And now that I am a budding Amateur Astronomer I have one more reason!
wish we could all get together and VETO it!
Fat Chance.
Love your column.
DST
Posted by John
March 20, 2009 At 11:42 AM PDT
Got GREAT idea. Since the sun rises a half hour later here in Ohio than it does at the brain trust (that's Wash. D.C), Ohio's DST should 1.5hrs and not 1.0. Eastern Indiana could be 1.75hrs, etc. That makes about as much sense as 8 months of DST.
|
|
|
||
|
|
Date:
|






comments (25)