Top 5 Most Recent Articles
Top 5 Most Popular Articles

NEWS by Tony Flanders
December 21, 2012
In case you haven't heard, there's a piece of hysteria going around (pumped up by movie marketing) that the world will end on December 21, 2012, supposedly based on astronomy and an ancient Mayan prediction.
Did the Mayans really think this? Is the astronomy for real? Do we actually have anything to worry about? The answers, not surprisingly, are "no," "no," and "of course not."
To make a long story short, December 21, 2012, really is a big flip-the-page date in the ancient Mayans' calendar. But there's no evidence that they believed the world would end then, and a fair amount of evidence to the contrary. Not that it would matter if they did. As for the planetary and galactic lineups that latter-day doom-mongers have tried to associate with that date, they're flat-out wrong.
But you probably have friends and family who are getting nervous that America will crack apart into cookie crumbs, tsunamis will sweep over the Himalayas, Earth's poles will flip, and a secret invisible planet will smack us down like a bowling pin. And they will be turning to you, the astronomy person, to ask about it.
We have the stuff you need to tell them. Noted archaeoastronomer E. C. Krupp explains all the details, and the history of this mania, in the cover story of the November 2009 issue of Sky & Telescope, now available at a newsstand near you. You probably won't find it in your supermarket, but it should be on the magazine rack in any good bookstore. And if it's sold out, you can always subscribe!
Incidentally, in that same issue, S&T editor-in-chief Robert Naeye describes some cosmic catastrophes that actually could happen — and explains why they're not likely to strike in the next millennium or two. Humanity has more pressing things to worry about.
P.S. A tidbit from Krupp's article: Boston University has a Center for Millennial Studies, and its director, historian Richard Landes, points out that throughout history, failed end-of-the-world movements have numbered in the "hundreds of thousands at least." There's never a shortage of people eager for everything to go kaput. Or at least to spin hoaxes about it.
To make a long story short, December 21, 2012, really is a big flip-the-page date in the ancient Mayans' calendar. But there's no evidence that they believed the world would end then, and a fair amount of evidence to the contrary. Not that it would matter if they did. As for the planetary and galactic lineups that latter-day doom-mongers have tried to associate with that date, they're flat-out wrong.
But you probably have friends and family who are getting nervous that America will crack apart into cookie crumbs, tsunamis will sweep over the Himalayas, Earth's poles will flip, and a secret invisible planet will smack us down like a bowling pin. And they will be turning to you, the astronomy person, to ask about it.
We have the stuff you need to tell them. Noted archaeoastronomer E. C. Krupp explains all the details, and the history of this mania, in the cover story of the November 2009 issue of Sky & Telescope, now available at a newsstand near you. You probably won't find it in your supermarket, but it should be on the magazine rack in any good bookstore. And if it's sold out, you can always subscribe!
Incidentally, in that same issue, S&T editor-in-chief Robert Naeye describes some cosmic catastrophes that actually could happen — and explains why they're not likely to strike in the next millennium or two. Humanity has more pressing things to worry about.
P.S. A tidbit from Krupp's article: Boston University has a Center for Millennial Studies, and its director, historian Richard Landes, points out that throughout history, failed end-of-the-world movements have numbered in the "hundreds of thousands at least." There's never a shortage of people eager for everything to go kaput. Or at least to spin hoaxes about it.
Posted by Tony Flanders, October 15, 2009
The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
First comments (from 29)
2012: The Great Internet Hoax
Posted by 2012hoax
October 15, 2009 At 03:47 PM PDT
Thank you for publishing this excellent article on 2012. I wanted to commend S&T for taking this stance against the hysteria that has been dogging amateur astronomers worldwide for the past few years.
It is not enough to assume that people will simply see through the 2012 nonsense, we must make every effort to inform them. Kudos for helping equip the people involved in astronomy outreach with the tools to debunk this myth.
For the past year I have been involved with a wiki that seeks to detail every claim made about 2012 and debunk it. Other amateurs/professionals or just interested parties are welcome to contribute. The site is 2012hoax.org.
Thanks.
The most horrible scam, to date.
Posted by PoshNinja
October 16, 2009 At 01:28 AM PDT
As 2012hoax stated, I would like to thank you for posting this article. This scam has gone way too far and it's gotten to the point where some people are talking about suicide, becoming dangerously depressed, children are becoming frightened and depressed by this 2012 farce that the media spews every two seconds on the television. So simply for standing up to these people, thank you. I just hope that we aren't too late to help these people who are scared.
2012
Posted by p krause
October 16, 2009 At 11:08 AM PDT
This article is short on facts. There are over a dozen books on the 2012 Mayan prophecies. The basis for real concern is the Mayan's use of numbers to encode predictions regarding solar flare ups. See 2012 by Patrick Geryl or the writhing of Maurice M Cotterell( Supergods etc). It's great to dismiss things out of hand but this was NOT covered in this article or disputed. Further research needs to be done by your magazine and contributors.
On-or-about 2012
Posted by Peter Wilson
October 16, 2009 At 11:22 AM PDT
Something is in the air.
On-or-about 2012
Posted by Peter Wilson
October 16, 2009 At 11:22 AM PDT
Something is in the air.
Whack-a-mole
Posted by Christine P.
October 16, 2009 At 12:35 PM PDT
Congrats to S&T for countering the 2012 nonsense. The challenge is like a frustrating game of whack-a-mole: debunk one myth and three more spring up, each more outlandish than the last.
@P Krause - Patrick Geryl wrote the book "How to Survive 2012" which in my opinion makes him just another scaremonger trying to make money by terrifying his readers. Besides, considering that the sun is in its longest solar minimum since the early 20th century, it's pretty clear we won't have to worry about monster flares or solar storms in a short three years! Perhaps you'd rather start warning us about pole shifts and "galactic alignments." ;-)
An offer you cannot turn down
Posted by John.St
October 16, 2009 At 02:00 PM PDT
An offer you cannot possibly turn down if you are honest.
p krause
I offer to pay you US$ 10,000.00 (ten thousand US dollars) per month starting November 1, in the year 2009 (gregorian calendar) and until December 31, in the year 2012 (gregorian calendar).
Commencing January 1, in the year 2013 (gregorian calendar) you and your heir shall be bound to pay me and all and any of my heirs 100,000.00 Euro (one hundred thousand Euro) per month as long as the Earth exists.
Deal?
I extend this offer to any and all who believe the Earth to cease to exist on December 21, 2009 (gregorian calendar).
That is how you deal with crackpots
Posted by John.St
October 16, 2009 At 02:14 PM PDT
who are so gullible, they believe in any sort of mumbo-jumbo.
2012 and other stuff
Posted by Mike
October 16, 2009 At 06:52 PM PDT
It seems ST is a very politically motivated magazine. Kinda glad I dont buy it anymore. I dont buy any of the end of world theories. Kinda reminds me of the Christians who told us Jesus would land and take hif throne at the White House on Januanry 1st 2000. Lot of my friends in 1999 started reading the Bible like the first issue of Playboy. But although I dont believe in the 'end times'. The fact that the Maya were hundreds of times more aware of Astronomy than any person, or almost every person living today should be considered. These people, who most Americans would call 'hunter/gatherers' knew about the precession of the equinoxes which most astronomers I have met say is a myth. Its funny how two page articles are written just to call people like John Major Jenkins idiots when ST itself does not say anything scientific other than, the Mayans liked astronomy. What makes me more iritated is that dopey Krupp goes along with the idea that we only have 8 planets now. Its sad my children are going to grow up being taught political astronomy in schools and I will have to show them what its really about and what ancient civilizations have known for thousands of years.
2012
Posted by Jolyne
October 17, 2009 At 05:04 AM PDT
I don't think it's true that the world will end in 2012.
|
|
|
||
|
|
Date:
|


comments (29)