7 Decades of Sky & Telescope - Now Available!


Kelly Beatty
NEWS by Kelly Beatty

A "Whodunit" in the Asteroid Belt

The mystery of a comet-like object circling among the main-belt asteroids has deepened, now that astronomers have slewed the Hubble Space Telescope over for a close-up look.

At first astronomers though the object designated P/2010 A2 was a comet, but this Hubble Space Telescope image, taken January 29th with the Wide Field Camera 3, suggests that it's not behaving like a normal comet.
NASA / ESA / D. Jewitt (UCLA)
Today's release of an HST image taken four days ago shows that P/2010 A2 is no normal comet. There's a strange X-shape feature at its brightest end (I hesitate to call it a "nucleus") that defies easy explanation. "This is quite different from the smooth dust envelopes of normal comets," explains David Jewitt (University of California at Los Angeles), who led the Hubble effort. The Hubble view also clearly shows a pointlike object hovering nearby, about 1,000 miles from the "X" and seemingly connected to it by a thread of material.

Comets within the asteroid belt aren't unprecedented. Jewitt's website comments that four others are known. Most notable among these is 133P/Elst-Pizarro, first spotted as an asteroid in 1979 and then found to have a cometary appearance in 1996.

But apart from its long tail of debris, P/2010 A2 doesn't look much like a comet, at least in the HST images taken on January 25th and 29th. Moreover, it lacks the emissions that are usually found in a comet's coma and tail. "No gas yet," Jewitt told me, "but we are still looking." Unfortunately, a request to observe this curiosity with the Spitzer Space Telescope was turned down.

Enlarging the Hubble Space Telescope image shows the unusual crisscrossing filaments of the comet-like object designated P/2010 A2. Note the how one strand extends to the "nucleus' at left. This cropped view is about 4,000 miles (7,000 km) across.
NASA / ESA / D. Jewitt (UCLA)
The most likely explanation for this object's sudden appearance (it's a stretch to call it "dramatic" — it's only 20th magnitude) is that a pair of small, unseen asteroids collided, creating the trail of debris first spotted on January 6th by the LINEAR telescope in New Mexico.

So would a smashup involving two main-belt asteroids result in something like this? Perhaps. "Bill Bottke and I are thinking about what kind of modeling would be useful to do with this object," notes David Nesvorny (Southwest Research Institute), "but we have nothing definitive so far." Bottke notes that while a collision seems plausible, it's also possible we are witnessing an asteroid that's been spun up (by gradual interactions with sunlight) to the point that it started shedding mass.

Jewitt says that there's no handle yet on whether the "nucleus" is tumbling or spinning rapidly. But he says more Hubble sessions are planned in the months ahead.

Posted by Kelly Beatty, February 2, 2010
related content: Solar system news
links: + digg | + del.icio.us | + reddit | + permalink | + rss

comments (4)

Post a Comment


The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.

all comments (4 total)

astroid collission

Posted by Noah February 2, 2010 At 04:55 PM PST
Bottke may be onto something will the shedding mass thing. I think it is quite possible.


astroid collission

Posted by bill February 3, 2010 At 09:17 AM PST
Is there enough evidense to rewind and pattern back using computer symulatiom?


Comet Holmes repeat

Posted by WWooten February 4, 2010 At 03:41 PM PST
Thought something like this, on grander scale, was what happened to nucleus of Comet Holmes in late October 2007. Probably asteroid no bigger than a large building could have blown out debris, much like Deep Impact did to Comet Tempel II in 2005. Think difference in appearance is due to angle of impact and ejected debris field...Holmes pointing away from us, almost circular, and this side impact making "tail" much more visible.


Wrong Measure

Posted by D. Solo February 16, 2010 At 02:53 AM PST
Nasa.gov/mission.... estimate the nucleus to be 460 feet in diameter. This tells us the nucleus is about 1 mile from the center of the " x "( not 1000 miles.) ( "cropped view" is not 4000 miles across ) And this shrinks this bird to a more human size.


Search:
 
Tag:
 
Author:
 
Date:  
 









Sky Publishing, a New Track Media Company
Copyright © 2012 New Track Media. All rights reserved.
Sky & Telescope, Night Sky, and SkyandTelescope.com are registered trademarks of New Track Media