Kelly Beatty
HOMEPAGE NEWS by Kelly Beatty

Wanted: A Little Common (Sky) Sense

The reporting of common sky events like bright meteors often gets completely mangled when no one bothers to check first with those who know something about the subject.

Doctor operating a jackhammer?
A television commercial for a popular heartburn medication suggests that your doctor isn't qualified to do your job — and vice versa.
AstraZeneca
A TV commercial that's currently airing shows a white-coated physician in the street trying, and failing miserably, to operate a jackhammer. The narrator says, "You wouldn't want your doctor doing your job, so why are you trying to do his?"

I thought of that this week when I read a report about how pilots who'd been fighting the Springer Fire in central Colorado were spooked on Wednesday, June 20th, by reports of a "meteor shower" in the area. In response, officials decided to ground two heavy air tankers and four single-engine craft for a couple of hours. My initial response was, "C'mon, really?"

A little digging turned up the specifics. At around 12:40 p.m. Mountain time, a dramatic daylight fireball was seen by many folks in Colorado, as well as in Wyoming, Nebraska, and New Mexico. The cause was probably a space rock a few inches to a few feet across, though veteran observer Chris Peterson says that with no smoke trail, no video, no radar, and no reports of sonic booms for this event, we'll never know for sure. Peterson estimates that the interplanetary intruder entered the atmosphere over northeastern Colorado, more than 150 miles from the fire zone — not to mention that it probably incinerated itself at least 40 or 50 miles up.

In any case, the multiple sightings (misinterpreted as multiple events), combined with one air-tanker crew reporting something in the sky near its plane, led officials to err on the side of caution. "It was a unique situation," says Richard Zuniga, a spokesman for the Rocky Mountain Area Coordination Center, during which "we rely on the pilots" to take the best course of action.

Make no mistake: I've got the greatest respect for firefighting teams. But Wednesday's situation underscores that officials in all kinds of decision-making positions — from firefighters to police dispatchers to news-media assignment desks — know little about what's going on in the sky and space above them. Peterson tried to channel accurate information to numerous news organizations, but, he laments, "It's not easy."

Space junk or fluke fragment?
Is this a piece of a satellite that fell to Earth from orbit — or, less dramatically, a chunk of metal flung off malfunctioning machinery? When found in December 2011, Boston-area television reporters really hoped it was space debris (but it wasn't).
Kathy Curran / CBS Boston
I know what he means: some months ago, several reporters in the Boston area called me to verify that a strange metal rod, having punched its way through a roof, was a chunk of space debris. Clearly it wasn't, but that didn't stop the reporters from going on air with the story anyway.

The broader point here this: I don't know much about fighting fires, so if my house starts burning I'll quickly call in the experts at the local fire station. In turn, I'd ask that they make an effort to call me if someone runs into their station claiming to have seen a meteorite hit the ground that was smoking (nope), sizzling (afraid not), or oozing something green (ha!) after it landed.

At last check, Sky & Telescope's online directory of clubs and organizations has nearly 1,800 entries in the U.S. and another 1,800 elsewhere in the world. That's a whole lot of local, knowledgeable folks willing to volunteer their services. Now, maybe you don't have a personal meteorite collection, but I'll wager someone in your club does. You know that a bright meteor's momentary flash looks nothing like the slow-motion track of a satellite passing overhead. And we've all come across folks who see Venus blazing in the evening sky and swear that it wasn't there the night before.

Weather forecasters often serve as the "station scientists" in their newsrooms. Here Paul Gross, a meteorologist at WDIV in Detroit, explains a recent astronomical finding.
WDIV
So let's try to inject a little more cosmic common sense into the local dialogue. One of the best ways is to reach out to radio and television meteorologists in your area. Think about it: those weather forecasters are likely the only ones in their newsrooms who've had any real scientific training. They are, literally, the station scientists. You can start by sending them a head's up for an upcoming meteor shower or a widely visible pass of the International Space Station. Once they realize you're a local resource for things astronomical, they'll be more receptive to enlisting your help for sky-related stories.

Who knows? You might even end up being interviewed on camera — in which case don't forget to comb your hair and wear a nice shirt!

Posted by Kelly Beatty, June 25, 2012
related content: Astronomy and society
Share this story:

Other links: + digg | + reddit | + del.icio.us | + rss

comments (21)

Post a Comment


The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.

First comments (from 21)

common sense

Posted by john crawford June 26, 2012 At 04:45 AM PDT
While we are discussing comet sense (spelling intentional), how about movies, TV, the media, etc. depicting comets visibly moving across the sky in real time. Even science channels are guilty of this. Then, how about asteroid fields so dense that Mark Twain's cat would find it hard to swing it's way through (again the science channels are very guilty). If asteroid fields were that dense our outer solar system would never have got through them. A little common sense (and calculations) would show that from the average asteroid in the main belt you probably would be lucky to seen another asteroid of naked eye visibility. It's not like flying through Saturn's rings Folks!


You want WHAT?!?

Posted by Peter Wilson June 26, 2012 At 08:09 AM PDT
If we had common sense, we would not allow clear-cutting of our national forests in the first place, which results in clear-burning when the dense re-growth catches fire. If we had any sense, crews would be on the ground thinning the forests--removing the small trees and leaving the big ones, not the other way around--before the fires break out. If we had some sense, we would be preventing fires, not fighting them. We are trying to fix with technology and a lot of aviation fuel what the logging barons have destroyed with greed. There is no sense to forestry management except maximizing short term gain, and foisting the long-term losses on the tax-payers. With the goal in forestry being private profit and public liability, why consult astronomers over anything?


Scientific ignorance

Posted by Justin S June 26, 2012 At 11:17 AM PDT
One afternoon in the 1970’s, I pointed out the gibbous moon to a lady I was dating. "What's it doing up there in the daytime?" she asked. She thought it only "came out" at night. She was no kid. She was 35. Just this spring, I dated a 66 yr old lady. I mentioned to her that a multi-planet exo-system had been discovered. Her reply was, "So they have a galaxy all their own!" she said. I just sighed and said yes. One could write a book about the general public's appalling ignorance of fundamental science. But one would think that college educated news writers would be better. Oh wait, "Communications" is liberal arts. They don’t have to take mathematics or science classes.


Common (Sky) Sense

Posted by Tom Hoffelder June 26, 2012 At 01:58 PM PDT
Never underestimate the ignorance of the general public. And when it comes to astronomy, that's a bunch of people. The good news is that ignorance can be cured. The bad news is that those suffering the disease have to want to be cured.


Inaccurate Reporting

Posted by Bruce Mayfield June 26, 2012 At 07:39 PM PDT
Sensible comments all. Have ya’ll observed this to be the case that, whatever your personal interests, experiences or expertise may be, when you hear some general news report describing this item that you already know the facts about, they almost invariably get it wrong. Is the accuracy of reporting really inversely proportional to the depth of your knowledge of something, or, as seems more logical, are they just usually wrong? This has led me to spend a lot less time watching general TV news reports.


Ignorance ...

Posted by Mike W. Herberich June 29, 2012 At 07:53 AM PDT
Very interesting topic(s), very inciting views. I'd like to contribute from a different angle. But 1st to the grounding by the officials mentioned in the original article. This is easily explained and understood: would you as an official want to be made responsible to NOT have grounded your pilots, knowing there actually WAS a meteor shower (be sure: you WOULD be made responsible in case SOMETHING DID happen!) Or worse: your beloved child or spouse is flying one of the planes: wouldn't you implore him/ her to rest grounded for at least an hour or so to be on the safe side? Never mind about the probability of a meteor hit? I would! The entire world could call me ridiculous (but surely would NOT, again, in case something actually DID happen! And they'd all applaud my wondrous foresight). IT goes to show that there never is a PURE rational/ factual side to ANYTHING that WE ALL do, say, think ... EVER. We are all integral persons. Probabilities are NEVER 0, never 1, either. Now, ...


... furthermore ...

Posted by Mike W. Herberich June 29, 2012 At 08:05 AM PDT
... for Bruce's expertise inverse proportionality and Tom's ignorance cure, etc.; my angle: we ALL have fields in which we are experts, also others in which we are NO expert (to put it mildly!) Take any example (appropriate for you!), say, gardening (my excuses to all avid gardeners in advance, just a to be replaced in this "function"!): not only do I know NOTHING about it, but I'd appease myself/ rationalize that indisputable fact by denying gardening the right to be a "real" science: I'd call it thoroughly uninteresting, plus completely irrelevant to the world and its advance! Yet, of course, in the back of my mind I'd know it weren't! THAT is how we all function, regardless of whether we do acknowledge it (which in most cases relevant to ourselves we do NOT!) or not. Only "cure": be as aware as much and as often as possible that we ARE like this! Justin, your date just couldn't have cared less about astronomy (maybe she cared about YOU more at that moment).


Sky Sense

Posted by Kris June 29, 2012 At 03:52 PM PDT
Kelly, You gotta be kidding. I haven't seen a TV 'Weatherman' yet who knows anything other than how to read weather info on a crib sheet. Have you seen any of LA's TV weathermen and/or women in action. Universally, they have no idea they know so little. As to their explaining something scientific, such as meteorites, well.... forget it.


More Sky Sence

Posted by Bruce June 29, 2012 At 04:08 PM PDT
Mike, I can use you’re very example to illustrate my point! Like you, I don’t have much interest in gardening. My wife does however; she’s even been through the Master Gardener program put on by the Ag Extension Service here in Texas. So one night we’re watching the local TV news and the “station scientist” meteorologist comes out with his “annual tomato formula” fertilizer recipe. “That’s not right,” my wife exclaims, “If you do that every year you’ll poison your soil with too much phosphorus!” Kelly, your one of my favorite teachers, but do you seriously think typical weather reporters are up to the challenge of accurate astronomical reporting? Meteorology and Astronomy share the sky as the field of study, but consider their reputations: Astronomers are famous for being able to make amazingly accurate predictions centuries or more into the future, while weather forecasts are proverbial for … somewhat less accuracy. My apogees to the subset of Meteorologists who are also S&T readers, for YOU what Beatty suggests makes perfect sense. S&T should be required reading for all sky prognosticators.


Uneducated

Posted by Vinnie June 29, 2012 At 05:03 PM PDT
Jeepers, how uneducated can you get. And that's coming from a guy who never went to public school. (Guess that's why everyone should go to my site: skyhiastronomy.bravehost.com)


Search:
 
Tag:
 
Author:
 
Date:  
 









Sky Publishing, a New Track Media Company
Copyright © 2013 New Track Media. All rights reserved.
Sky & Telescope, Night Sky, and SkyandTelescope.com are registered trademarks of New Track Media