Top 5 Most Recent Articles
Top 5 Most Popular Articles
Top 5 Most Emailed Articles

HOMEPAGE NEWS by Stuart Goldman
"Pioneer Anomaly" Solved?
It's of no consequence, but the Pioneer 10 spacecraft launched on my 9th birthday. Although I don't recall if I noted the event while in the 3rd grade, that was the year I remember becoming interested in astronomy. That year I did a big report on "space" with my then best friend. (I still wonder if there are any remnants of the spray paint we used on the schoolyard blacktop to create our impressive outer-space backdrop for our model solar system.)
During the following 3½ decades, Pioneer 10 and its twin, Pioneer 11, blazed a trail out to Jupiter and Saturn, and then continued onward, well beyond the orbit of Pluto. They eventually fell silent Pioneer 11 faded out in 1995 and Pioneer 10 lasted until 2003.
But during the mission's many years of operation, tracking specialists noticed something odd: neither craft was exactly where it was supposed to be. After crossing billions of miles in space, they were instead thousands of miles closer to the Sun than expected a tiny fraction of the distance traveled, but nevertheless significant. Significant enough to have some people wondering if it was a sign of some unknown refinement needed to the theory of gravity, a bedrock of modern physics.
The latest examination of this curiosity concludes that no exotic explanations are required. According to Slava Turyshev (Jet Propulsion Laboratory), some of the retarding force is due to uneven emission of heat radiation from the spacecraft. He described his preliminary findings at a meeting of the American Physical Society earlier in the week, summing up work he's been doing for 15 years.
Turyshev has spent the last several years retrieving archival tracking records from obsolete storage media (those classic magnetic tapes, some of them corrupted) as well as detailed specifications of the Pioneer spacecraft itself from 40 years ago. He likens his searching and discovery to rooting around a dusty attic. "No one told me what I'd be getting into," he says. The Pioneer missions lasted so long that they outlived programming languages and data formats. (The Pioneers were launched in the days of punched cards.)
After piecing together the tracking history, Turyshev and his colleagues created a computer model of the Pioneer spacecraft and determined that they had warm and cool spots not previously modeled well. The uneven emission of infrared photons from the craft's radioactive power sources could account for at least a third of Pioneer 11's anomalous acceleration. (Photons, like other particles, carry a bit of momentum.)
What's still unclear is how the warm surfaces may have physically changed during the decades in space. Space weathering by dust particles, solar wind, and ultraviolet sunlight could have altered the thermal properties of the surfaces significantly, possibly enhancing the effect enough to account for the entire "Pioneer anomaly." The researchers hope to get clues to this by running various computer simulations of their model and by examining 40 gigabytes of telemetry data, which will indicate the state of many systems on the spacecraft, and thus how much power they actually used and how much heat they gave off.
An artist's concept of a Pioneer spacecraft in interstellar space. NASA maintained contact with Pioneer 11 until November 1995 and with Pioneer 10 until January 2003.
NASA / Don Davis
But during the mission's many years of operation, tracking specialists noticed something odd: neither craft was exactly where it was supposed to be. After crossing billions of miles in space, they were instead thousands of miles closer to the Sun than expected a tiny fraction of the distance traveled, but nevertheless significant. Significant enough to have some people wondering if it was a sign of some unknown refinement needed to the theory of gravity, a bedrock of modern physics.
The latest examination of this curiosity concludes that no exotic explanations are required. According to Slava Turyshev (Jet Propulsion Laboratory), some of the retarding force is due to uneven emission of heat radiation from the spacecraft. He described his preliminary findings at a meeting of the American Physical Society earlier in the week, summing up work he's been doing for 15 years.
Turyshev has spent the last several years retrieving archival tracking records from obsolete storage media (those classic magnetic tapes, some of them corrupted) as well as detailed specifications of the Pioneer spacecraft itself from 40 years ago. He likens his searching and discovery to rooting around a dusty attic. "No one told me what I'd be getting into," he says. The Pioneer missions lasted so long that they outlived programming languages and data formats. (The Pioneers were launched in the days of punched cards.)
After piecing together the tracking history, Turyshev and his colleagues created a computer model of the Pioneer spacecraft and determined that they had warm and cool spots not previously modeled well. The uneven emission of infrared photons from the craft's radioactive power sources could account for at least a third of Pioneer 11's anomalous acceleration. (Photons, like other particles, carry a bit of momentum.)
What's still unclear is how the warm surfaces may have physically changed during the decades in space. Space weathering by dust particles, solar wind, and ultraviolet sunlight could have altered the thermal properties of the surfaces significantly, possibly enhancing the effect enough to account for the entire "Pioneer anomaly." The researchers hope to get clues to this by running various computer simulations of their model and by examining 40 gigabytes of telemetry data, which will indicate the state of many systems on the spacecraft, and thus how much power they actually used and how much heat they gave off.
Posted by Stuart Goldman, April 18, 2008
The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
First comments (from 22)
Question on Error Estimate
Posted by William Vittitow
April 18, 2008 At 01:05 PM PDT
Did the calculations have an error estimate? Maybe just random variations could be enough to account for it?
dust
Posted by Charles
April 19, 2008 At 09:10 PM PDT
They still have not made it to the Ort cloud yet, but exactly what have they hit at they have traveled out of the solar system. And how has that changed their speed.
Flashback to 7 years ago ...
Posted by Daniel Fischer
April 20, 2008 At 10:37 AM PDT
Guess what: what's being presented as a partial solution for the anomaly now has been proclaimed the likely full solution in a paper written 7 years ago - see http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0107092 for the detailled work performed back then. When the paper came to my attention in 2002 I found it very convincing and couldn't believe ever since why it was ignored by the 'anomaly = new physics' faction ...
Lets give credit to Planetary Soc.
Posted by Joseph Haley
April 20, 2008 At 10:58 PM PDT
I don't know who this JPL gentlemen is, but do you know that it was the Planetary Soc. that gathered up those files of obsolete date from under a stairwell at NASA. They also had to purchace the last old machines capable of reading the material. The Soc. has spent at least a year going back over all the tapes that nobody else would even lift a finger to save. I think that at least they should have been mentioned in the story. This is not the first time that S$T have not given credit to the Soc. when it was due.
Pioneer Anomaly clarification
Posted by Richard D. Saam
April 21, 2008 At 12:37 PM PDT
30 percent of deceleration anomaly as radiation pressure consequence provides some hope that more definitive calculations can be provided with decreasing RTG power with distance vs deceleration anomaly.
I wish some attention would be devoted to spin deceleration anomaly.
Most importantly, has anyone heard of an attempt to verify anomaly by interpretation of New Horizons data.
That should be easy, but apparently not on NASA's priority list.
Thank for the planetary society
http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001400/
The outcome of this Pioneer anomaly analysis could guide astrophysics for many years.
YORP Meets Anomaly
Posted by Brian D. Warner
April 22, 2008 At 09:37 PM PDT
Sounds like they rediscovered the YORP effect. In the past few years, the re-emission of thermal radition from irregular surfaces has been used to explain the accleration (and deceleration) of asteroid rotation rates, the formation of binaries among smaller asteroids, and the common alignment of the spin axes of members in a family (e.g., see Slivan papers on the Koronis family). No doubt the irregular shape of the spacecraft along with "albedo variations" have caused the craft to be affected by a YORP equivalent. On a less complex level, the simple "Yarkovsky" effect, which changes the semi-major axis of asteroids (and other small bodies) - also due to thermal re-radiation - could explain the difference between expected and actual distance. It will be interesting to see what they find.
The Pioneer Anomaly can be solved
Posted by Bjarne Lorenzen
September 1, 2008 At 03:02 AM PDT
You will know why, by reading the 2 chapters:
- ABSTRACT
- PIONEER ANOMALY
At the site www.science27.com
It will take you only 5 minutes, and is simple and easy to understand…
Notice and the claim / prediction below:
The origin of the force of the pioneer anomaly is not directed towards the Sun, but around the Sun.
Also notice the claim: - when sending a space probe into clockwise circular orbit around the Sun, the mystery force will affect such space probe with stronger force as measured ever before.
The force we have discovered and measured so fare, is only a part it.
The scientific community is overshadowed due to basically wrong confusing information, - preventing them to solve the problem.
These predictions is possible, based on a simple (universal) theory, that will solve a lot more as only the Pioneer anomaly.
Don’t miss the staring gun.
Kind Regards
Bjarne Lorenzen
THE PIONEER AND FLYBY ANOMALIES ARE BOTH CAUSED BY THE SAME SIMPLE LAW OF NATURE.
Posted by Bjarne Lorenzen
July 10, 2009 At 08:15 PM PDT
Try to allow you self the thought that deformed space (caused by gravity) in reality means contracted space. Matter contracts space. Matter and space are connected. This gives friction and this simple fact slows down the pioneer space probes. This anomaly is hence not directed towards the Sun or Earth, but in all directions.
If matter is connected with space, the result is: when matter moved or rotate, space connected to matter moves / rotate too (follows behind). Call this space wind (SW).
SW rotates around a rotating astronomic body, and causing the flyby anomalies. When space probes are faster than the SW they will not get affected, this explains why probe not are affected by symmetric, but only by asymmetric orbits around a planet, because of the SW hence are faster than the probes.
Why are only space probes affected of SW and not the planets?
Itâs a question of kinetic energy, its easier for the SW to rotate a planet (lower velocity = lower relativistic energy) than it is to speed up the relative fast velocity a planet already have.
Also the planets rotation has friction, and requires constantly energy supply. Yes the SW is responsible for the rotation of the planets too.
SW is the exactly same law responsible for the underlying law of magnetism, SW is the exactly same law responsible for the underlying law of magnetism, we already know much about this law of nature, but not have fare it really reached.
And even the simplification: deformed space = contracted space, - explains the cause off gravity: Imaging two people demanding the same piece of spaghetti, the approach each other. Now imaging to bodies two bodies demanding the same space between them, - they approach each other.
And this deep understanding of the nature of gravity reveals much much more.
Itâs all so simple. Wake up, if you really want to know.
More > www.science27.com Updated several times the last year.
Its so simple
Posted by Bjarne Lorenzen
July 12, 2009 At 12:53 AM PDT
Sorry to many careless mistakes in my previous contribution. This one is hopefully better.
THE PIONEER ANOMALI
Try to allow your self the thought: - that deformed space (caused by gravity) in reality mean: Contracted Space. - Matter contracts space. Matter and space is connected. This gives friction when matter moves, and this could explain the cause of the Pioneer Anomaly.
THE FLYBLY ANOMALIES
If matter is connected with space, the result is ALSO : When matter moves (or rotate), space connected to matter will also move/rotate. Call this Space Wind (now,- SW).
SW rotates around a rotating astronomic object, and is causing the Flyby-Anomalies. This is already well supported: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13411
When space probes are faster than the SW, they will not get affected, this explain why probes are only affected in asymmetric orbits around a planet, because of the SW hence is faster than the space probes, so simple is that...
Why are only space probes affected of SW and not the planets?
It's a question of kinetic energy, the SW around the Sun or Earth is weak. It require more energy to accelerate a large body. (Also rotation of a body is important (more: http://www.science27.com).
If, - deformed space = contracted space, - it even explain the cause of gravity:
Imaging 2 people eating the same piece of spaghetti, - they will approach each other right ?
Now imaging 2 objects consuming/contracting the same space between them, they will also approach each other right ?. - This is how gravity works.
Now tell me the underlying cause of magnetism, (we know so well) ?
This answer is simple, - its SW (space in motion), - if matter pull space (together) and hence is connected to space, then also space in motion MUST pull matter, (and MUST pull a electron). OPEN you eyes, its all evidently, If you really want to wake up go here for a moment > http://www.science27.com
Same law of nature is responsible
Posted by Bjarne Lorenzen
July 12, 2009 At 12:56 AM PDT
Sorry to many careless mistakes in my previous contribution. This one is hopefully better.
THE PIONEER ANOMALI
Try to allow your self the thought: - that deformed space (caused by gravity) in reality mean: Contracted Space. - Matter contracts space. Matter and space is connected. This gives friction when matter moves, and this could explain the cause of the Pioneer Anomaly.
THE FLYBLY ANOMALIES
If matter is connected with space, the result is ALSO : When matter moves (or rotate), space connected to matter will also move/rotate. Call this Space Wind (now,- SW).
SW rotates around a rotating astronomic object, and is causing the Flyby-Anomalies. This is already well supported: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13411
When space probes are faster than the SW, they will not get affected, this explain why probes are only affected in asymmetric orbits around a planet, because of the SW hence is faster than the space probes, so simple is that...
Why are only space probes affected of SW and not the planets?
It's a question of kinetic energy, the SW around the Sun or Earth is weak. It require more energy to accelerate a large body. (Also rotation of a body is important (more: http://www.science27.com).
If, - deformed space = contracted space, - it even explain the cause of gravity:
Imaging 2 people eating the same piece of spaghetti, - they will approach each other right ?
Now imaging 2 objects consuming/contracting the same space between them, they will also approach each other right ?. - This is how gravity works.
Now tell me the underlying cause of magnetism, (we know so well) ?
This answer is simple, - its SW (space in motion), - if matter pull space (together) and hence is connected to space, then also space in motion MUST pull matter, (and MUST pull a electron). OPEN you eyes, its all evidently, If you really want to wake up go here for a moment > http://www.science27.com
|
|
|
||
|
|
Date:
|






comments (22)