Top 5 Most Recent Articles
Top 5 Most Popular Articles
Top 5 Most Emailed Articles

PLANETS by Sean Walker
Mercury, Messenger, and Observers
Taken by Messenger on January 14, 2008, from about 17,000 miles away, this view of a gibbous Mercury shows about half of the area not photographed by Mariner 10 in 197475.
NASA / JHU-APL / Carnegie Inst. of Washington
Amateurs and other ground-based observers are also reviewing these new photographs with a sense of vindication. Because Mercury never ventures far from the Sun as seen from Earth, it's the only planet (besides Earth) that can't be imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope. This leaves amateurs and occasionally the rare observation by a professional observatory as the primary source of information about this enigmatic world.
According to Frank J. Melillo, who coordinates the Association of Lunar and Planetary Observers' Mercury section, this is an exciting time to be observing the planet. Modern cameras available to amateurs have revolutionized the quality of observations possible with modest equipment. Seasoned solar-system photographers such as John Boudreau, Ed Lomeli, and the late Erwin Van Der Velden have imaged what have now been confirmed to be crater ejecta rays (see the comparison below) similar to those seen on the Moon.
Two days after Messenger's flyby, amateur John Boudreau of Saugus, Massachusetts, recorded many of the same light and dark features with an 11-inch telescope and a webcam, shown at the right. The Messenger image at left has been resampled for comparison.
John Boudreau, NASA / JHU-APL / Carnegie Inst. of Washington
Although Messenger has revealed more of Mercury's surface, a lot of it has yet to be seen. Also, the spacecraft isn't going to orbit the planet until 2011, so the next two flybys will likewise offer mere glimpses of the surface, while observers can record the planet's appearance during each favorable elongation.
A good comparison might be observing the Moon. Have you ever noticed that crater rays are not visible throughout the entire month? I'd bet 10-to-1 odds that it's similar on Mercury. So even not seeing something is a valuable observation.
The next few years are going to be the most exciting for Mercury observers!
Posted by Sean Walker, January 23, 2008
The following comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sky Publishing.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
By posting a comment, you agree to our Rules of Conduct and Terms of Use.
all comments (2 total)
Comparison?
Posted by Bill Wagstaff
January 28, 2008 At 10:21 AM PST
Where's the "comparison below" cited in the third paragraph?
Missing Images
Posted by David Tytell
January 28, 2008 At 10:53 AM PST
Sometimes our image heavy site hiccups and doesn't load article images. I'm sorry about that. Try hitting refresh, or type a ? at the end of the URL. That should fix it.
|
|
|
||
|
|
Date:
|






comments (2)