Is a 12- or 14-inch scope a dramatic improvement from a 6-inch telescope?

Nebulae and galaxies invariably look like shapeless, colorless blobs in my 6-inch telescope, a far cry from their spectacular appearance in photographs. If I buy a 12- or 14-inch scope, will I see a dramatic improvement?

Would that it were so! A larger telescope will better reveal the shapes of nebulae and galaxies, and it will show you many more such objects than your 6-inch, but it won’t turn dim grays into radiant blues and reds. For example, I can make out the Whirlpool Galaxy’s spiral arms in my 12-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain, but I see no hint of the red gas clouds and blue star clusters that speckle the arms in photos. Yet I can see those colors in images I shoot through the same instrument.

There’s a big difference between visual observing and astrophotography. The human eye-brain system, which isn’t very sensitive to dim light, has an effective “exposure time” of about 1/10 second. In contrast, the colorful photos of deep-sky objects gracing Sky & Telescope's pages and some manufacturers’ telescope boxes involve exposures lasting minutes or even hours. It takes that long to accumulate enough starlight to build up a pretty color picture on film or an electronic sensor.

The advent of inexpensive CCD cameras makes it easier than ever for amateurs to shoot colorful images of deep-sky objects with 6-inch and smaller telescopes. So if your goal is to capture the night sky’s spectacular colors, don’t give in to aperture envy — get yourself a camera instead.

— Richard Tresch Fienberg

All comments must follow the Sky & Telescope Terms of Use and will be moderated prior to posting. Please be civil in your comments. Sky & Telescope reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter’s username, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.